|
Stuck in the Middle by Desire [web]
[nfo]
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||
|
popularity : 58% |
|||||||
alltime top: #8027 |
|
|||||||
added on the 2025-08-03 20:26:13 by gigabates  |
||||||||
popularity helper
comments
Yeah, there we go!
rulez added on the 2025-08-03 20:33:40 by Ramon B5 
Well done DESiRE people. But why HAM when there's bacon? ;-)
It's funny that since BatmanGroup entered the race, now all other contestants are all doing Joker art, while it started from someone's beard :)
@Optimus it started from a tardigrade in Photon's original, but nobody wants to see that!
Nouuuuuuuuuuuuuuw recooooooooooooooord!
:D hahah loving it. Maybe next one uses something else than clowns =)
And this is going deeper and deeper in the abysses.... though going larger than overscan is going to be difficult (hi-rez anyone ? ;) ).
Congrats!
Congrats!
clap clap clap
Sweet! All 310600 bytes of it! :)
As for me i just love that font! :D So on theme!
Well done! Who is next? :)
As for me i just love that font! :D So on theme!
Well done! Who is next? :)
I love it
:)
Excellent Gigabates! :-)
Excellent!
Very epic. Great soundtrack, too. And I like the transition to the main attraction. :-)
Love it
Clowns to the left of me
Jokers to the right
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you
Well played, and an entertaining summer series. Keep em coming!
Jokers to the right
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you
Well played, and an entertaining summer series. Keep em coming!
I'm not smart enough to understand the inner workings of copperchunky, HAM, overscan, etc., and whether this counts as a record, but it looks really good!
That's how you should present a new record! Congratulations, guys!
By the way, I still like the way it looks in HAM better than in exact 4x4 :)
By the way, I still like the way it looks in HAM better than in exact 4x4 :)
Super nice!
Very nice with funny music (clapsnare = crap though)
Very cool
Nice pick for soundtrack and graphics, and the name was clever. Plus the music and texture are both well done.
Thank you for releasing your non-HAM version, it was cool to study. The HAM version is the star of course. I love that it is a sizable improvement over your own previous record, but on top of that you have added the rubber effect to it - everything takes time, but it adds style. Respect
Is 384 pixels the screen hardware limit? I dont think I've ever done anything beyond 352.
Nice pick for soundtrack and graphics, and the name was clever. Plus the music and texture are both well done.
Thank you for releasing your non-HAM version, it was cool to study. The HAM version is the star of course. I love that it is a sizable improvement over your own previous record, but on top of that you have added the rubber effect to it - everything takes time, but it adds style. Respect
Is 384 pixels the screen hardware limit? I dont think I've ever done anything beyond 352.
Very good looking and stylish execution.
The music itself gives it a distinctive touch.
It sounds very respectful from the mouth of the mighty Batman.
I agree.
The music itself gives it a distinctive touch.
Quote:
That's how you should present a new record! Congratulations, guys!
It sounds very respectful from the mouth of the mighty Batman.
I agree.
Well done!
This is great. All of these are great, but if I have to watch one more rotozoomer, I'll get dizzy.
Quote:
Is 384 pixels the screen hardware limit? I dont think I've ever done anything beyond 352.
I believe it is based on Photon's Coppershade article, and I was taking his word for it that all pixels can be displayed on some CRT monitors. If this proves not to be the case I will of course adjust my claim, and could potentially release a version with a similar pixel count in a less ridiculous width!
Nice subtle presentation. Big up!
Is that even possible? ;)
Epic.
Epic.
Something something Batham!
Amazing code and clever title/music/gfx combo.
Way cool
Lovely production!, me like! Rulez!
Cool
Great!
Sweet indeed!
About the maximum overscan: Back when we did Slummy's Rubber Challenge, I experimented to find out how much horizontal overscan would actually be visible on A500. I arrived at 376 ($5c to $d4). I'm quite sure it's not bigger than that. Maybe it's even smaller in some setups.
Is there any limitation to how wide a HAM chunky can be apart from the overscan limit? Does it really make sense to talk about a width record here?
Of course, with VHPOSW tricks, the maximum overscan can be pushed even further (though there still might be no monitors capable of displaying it). But good luck doing that on OCS, where VHPOSW can only be written by the CPU. With ECS Agnus (which most A500s have anyway) it might be feasible, though.
About the maximum overscan: Back when we did Slummy's Rubber Challenge, I experimented to find out how much horizontal overscan would actually be visible on A500. I arrived at 376 ($5c to $d4). I'm quite sure it's not bigger than that. Maybe it's even smaller in some setups.
Is there any limitation to how wide a HAM chunky can be apart from the overscan limit? Does it really make sense to talk about a width record here?
Of course, with VHPOSW tricks, the maximum overscan can be pushed even further (though there still might be no monitors capable of displaying it). But good luck doing that on OCS, where VHPOSW can only be written by the CPU. With ECS Agnus (which most A500s have anyway) it might be feasible, though.
very enjoyable production and amazing code, well done! :)
Great stuff overall but the music put a big grin on my face :)
@Blueberry No it's absolutely not a width record. The reasons I made it this wide are:
- just for fun in the context of the other records, even though it doesn't count for anything :-)
- to see how close we can get to Evil's 400px Atari version
- making it as wide as possible has a some benefit for the total pixel count (ssshhh!)
I based this on Photon's assertion that 384 can be displayed on some CRTs. I appreciate the irony of this given the history, and I'm also not trying to pass the buck in any way. Although I don't own the hardware to verify this, the fact that vAmiga emulator rendered all columns gave me some reassurance. It really does sound like I need to do a more reasonable version that can definitely be fully displayed.
I've been playing with VHPOSW tricks for *other things* and I agree it's a pain in the arse!
- just for fun in the context of the other records, even though it doesn't count for anything :-)
- to see how close we can get to Evil's 400px Atari version
- making it as wide as possible has a some benefit for the total pixel count (ssshhh!)
I based this on Photon's assertion that 384 can be displayed on some CRTs. I appreciate the irony of this given the history, and I'm also not trying to pass the buck in any way. Although I don't own the hardware to verify this, the fact that vAmiga emulator rendered all columns gave me some reassurance. It really does sound like I need to do a more reasonable version that can definitely be fully displayed.
I've been playing with VHPOSW tricks for *other things* and I agree it's a pain in the arse!
HAM versions still count in my book!
Impressive.
OK. Nice tune.
Very nicely played. Why HAM? Do you have any reference to read the details?
records are intended to be broken, well done!
Great !!
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !