pouët.net

psenough information 10425 glöps

• general:
• level: user
• personal:
• first name: Filipe
• last name: Cruz
• portals:
• demozoo: profile
• cdcs:
• cdc #1: Hyperventilation by Byterapers [web]
• cdc #2: deesbab by orange
• cdc #3: Megablast by orange
• cdc #4: a deepness in the sky by mfx [web]
• cdc #5: fake elektronik lightshow by Ephidrena
• cdc #6: migracija by kosmoplovci [web]
• cdc #7: zebra by Pas Maters [web]
• cdc #8: i'am the seed by CyberPunks Unity [web] & Inward [web]

• diskmag Windows Hugi #29 - The Blue One by Hugi [web]
• adok wants to have sex with me and optimus will be back.
  o_O
  
• isokadded on the 2004-08-10 13:50:53
• wild Animation/Video fuckhead by Satori [web]
• can we have a list of the braindeads who were in the jury? it was missing from the results.txt
• isokadded on the 2004-08-10 12:38:28
• demo MS-Dos Weird by Demaniacs
• was simple but pretty cool at the time i first saw it :)
• rulezadded on the 2004-08-10 07:41:13
• wild Animation/Video fuckhead by Satori [web]
• doc: h7 told me at bzm that it was disq couz of time length and that he didnt care about it couz he didnt do the rules for it.
  but at results.txt there still is jury points for it.
  
  and it makes no sense to disq it either for file size limit or time limit. if you're showing a film you should fucking keep it on the higher res possible, why would anyone want to loose quality on digital format/bitrate conversions?
  
  i even bothered writting on "comments to organizers": "please fade out on 5 minutes instead of disqualifying it"
  
  i just wonder, if the compo orgas dont know what happened, who the hell does?
  should i bother abyss once again and hear another "chimera wasnt disqualified by asm orgas, it was the jury" and the jury coming back with "we didnt even see it"
  
  how many fucking years will we keep having this shit at asm?
  
  i sure as fucking hell am not planning participating again.
  
  whats the point of working 2 months on a prod to see it getting disqualified and still released without any decent reason?
  
  where im from ppl give a fuck about the prods and the people who make them. i always thought the "best demoparty" would also, but im seriously starting to reconsider it..
  
  even fucking kooma still gets disqualified, i bet they only played nosfe's video for a change couz he was in the hospital.
  
  bah, "greetings to accession only, fuckings to lamers."
• isokadded on the 2004-08-10 06:45:56
• wild Animation/Video if i could trade this ache for indifference by Nosfe [web]
• rulezadded on the 2004-08-09 10:55:13
• wild Animation/Video Sormiväritelkkari - Finger Color Television by tAAt [web]
• if analogue feedback is alternative and/or innovative then im santa claus.
  
  cute effects though so no thumb down.
• isokadded on the 2004-08-09 10:52:25
• demo Windows elektronimusiikkia by Matt Current [web]
• the lines were nice and some other things but it didnt convince me.
  matt current can do alot better.
• isokadded on the 2004-08-09 10:26:44
• demo Windows vIIt by Noice [web]
• wasnt there some rule that said it was illegal to reuse previously released material?
  oh well, whatever..
• isokadded on the 2004-08-09 10:25:27
• wild Animation/Video Progression
• i guess they disqualified it couz there was no music or something
• isokadded on the 2004-08-09 10:19:05
• wild Animation/Video fuckhead by Satori [web]
• if anyone can explain to me why this was disqualified please let me know.
  i sure as fuck cant figure it out.
  and i sure as fuck wont recommend anyone to release any short_films for asm ever again, let alone bother beeing the delivery boy.
  pardon my french, i am pissed.
• rulezadded on the 2004-08-09 10:13:25