pouët.net

HellMood information 4199 glöps

• general:
• level: user
• personal:
• portals:
• demozoo: profile
• cdcs:
• cdc #1: Crystal Dream 2 by Triton
• cdc #2: Hydrokinetics by Prismbeings
• cdc #3: Overdrive 2 by Titan [web]
• cdc #4: Way Too Rude by Logicoma [web] & Loonies [web]
• cdc #5: There by Still [web]
• cdc #6: Sojourn of the Soul by Flex
• cdc #7: Hexer by LJ

• 1k JavaScript Mysterious Monorail by Desire [web]
• misty mysterious monorail hype!
• rulezadded on the 2015-03-13 09:50:46
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• The improved version is on : http://js1k.com/2015-hypetrain/demo/2313
  I hope i mentioned everybody : http://js1k.com/2015-hypetrain/details/2313
• isokadded on the 2015-03-12 18:34:43
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• Finally! ^_^ Thanks to all of you guys! I think i'll brighten this one up a little to compensate the lower density and then resubmit :)
• isokadded on the 2015-03-11 16:19:50
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• @tomaes, how is this for you? http://hellmood.111mb.de/pp1MsmallAudio.html
• isokadded on the 2015-03-11 16:08:04
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• yeah, makes perfect sense oO
  
  p01 said audio "fails silently", so if you rightclick/"inspect element" on the canvas, any errors in sight?
  
  this is what i do to setup audio:
  
  Code:f = new AudioContext(); w = f.createScriptProcessor(8192,0,1); w.connect(f.destination); w.onaudioprocess=function(e){...}
  
  so one of these calls most likely fails
• isokadded on the 2015-03-11 15:40:10
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• hrmpf --> http://mohayonao.github.io/web-audio-test-api/
• isokadded on the 2015-03-11 15:29:47
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• I simply reduced the number to one million and scaled it down a little, so that particles don't go offsreen (huge performance killer). Glad to have at least a quick workaround :)
  
  For the audio, in short, what does this test give you?
  http://mohayonao.github.io/web-audio-test-api/
  i have (top right corner)
  
  Quote:

  passes: 208
  failures: 0

• isokadded on the 2015-03-11 15:25:59
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• Not likely, since i have the same values there
  
  Quote:

  Max Vertex Attributes: 16
  Max Varying Vectors: 9
  
  Max Vertex Uniform Vectors: 254
  Max Fragment Uniform Vectors: 221
  
  Max Fragment Texture Image Units: 16
  Max Vertex Texture Image Units: 4
  Max Combined Texture Image Units: 20
  
  Max 2D Texture Size: 8192
  Max Cube Texture Size: 8192
  
  Max Texture Anisotropy: 16
  
  Point Size Range: 1 - 8192
  Line Width Range: 1 - 1
  
  Max Viewport Dimensions: 8192 - 8192
  Max Renderbuffer Size: 8192
  
  Framebuffer Red Bits: 8
  Framebuffer Green Bits: 8
  Framebuffer Blue Bits: 8
  Framebuffer Alpha Bits: 8
  
  Framebuffer Depth Bits: 24
  Framebuffer Stencil Bits: 8
  Framebuffer Subpixel Bits: 4
  
  MSAA Samples: 4
  MSAA Sample Buffers: 1
  
  Supported Formats for UByte Render Targets : RGBA RGB
  Supported Formats for Half Float Render Targets: RGBA RGB
  Supported Formats for Full Float Render Targets: RGBA RGB
  
  Max Multiple Render Targets Buffers: 0
  
  High Float Precision in Vertex Shader: 23 (-2127 - 2127)
  Medium Float Precision in Vertex Shader: 23 (-2127 - 2127)
  Low Float Precision in Vertex Shader: 23 (-2127 - 2127)
  
  High Float Precision in Fragment Shader: 23 (-2127 - 2127)
  Medium Float Precision in Fragment Shader: 23 (-2127 - 2127)
  Low Float Precision in Fragment Shader: 23 (-2127 - 2127)
  
  High Int Precision in Vertex Shader: 0 (-224 - 224)
  Medium Int Precision in Vertex Shader: 0 (-224 - 224)
  Low Int Precision in Vertex Shader: 0 (-224 - 224)
  
  High Int Precision in Fragment Shader: 0 (-224 - 224)
  Medium Int Precision in Fragment Shader: 0 (-224 - 224)
  Low Int Precision in Fragment Shader: 0 (-224 - 224)
  
  Supported Extensions: ANGLE_instanced_arrays
  EXT_blend_minmax
  EXT_frag_depth
  EXT_shader_texture_lod
  EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic
  WEBKIT_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic
  OES_element_index_uint
  OES_standard_derivatives
  OES_texture_float
  OES_texture_float_linear
  OES_texture_half_float
  OES_texture_half_float_linear
  OES_vertex_array_object
  WEBGL_compressed_texture_s3tc
  WEBKIT_WEBGL_compressed_texture_s3tc
  WEBGL_debug_renderer_info
  WEBGL_debug_shaders
  WEBGL_depth_texture
  WEBKIT_WEBGL_depth_texture
  WEBGL_lose_context
  WEBKIT_WEBGL_lose_context
  
  WebGL Renderer: WebKit WebGL
  WebGL Vendor: WebKit
  WebGL Version: WebGL 1.0 (OpenGL ES 2.0 Chromium)
  Shading Language Version: WebGL GLSL ES 1.0 (OpenGL ES GLSL ES 1.0 Chromium)
  
  Unmasked Renderer: ANGLE (NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ Direct3D9Ex vs_3_0 ps_3_0)
  Unmasked Vendor: Google Inc.

  
  
  Maybe an ATI thing? Or D3D11? Rest looks unsuspicious ... How does this one perform for you? >>>One Million / Small<<<
• isokadded on the 2015-03-11 15:05:24
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• As for unexpected slowness in Chrome, this could be one reason :
  
  Quote:

  For some strange reason it's really slow in Chrome here. In Firefox it's mostly smooth, but about every second there's a lag with many frames skipped

  
  
  Quote:

  Hrrrm, it seems Chrome is using software rendering for webgl, indicating my graphics card has been blacklisted, trying to override it...

  
  
  Quote:

  Yup, now running at good speed!

  
  
  Quote:

  This one says "SwiftShader" if it's not using hardware acceleration: http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/webgl-maxparams-test/

  
  (thanks again to cmr)
• isokadded on the 2015-03-11 14:15:27
• 1k JavaScript Particle Party by Desire [web]
• p01, thanks! i will look into it :)
  
  As for all the errors, please be patient. This is my first JS production. Same is true for 1K and WebGL. I tested like a dozen OS/browser combinations, and it works on every single one ... for me, that is, but on an eight year old computer(!) I have some suspects for performance problems, but for some problems i don't yet have an answer. Escpecially for Chrome and Fox (and somewhat modern hardware) i didn't expect ANY problem. Therefor, i'm thankful for any kind of information, regarding problems :)
• isokadded on the 2015-03-11 14:06:17