pouët.net

thunder_burn information 100 glöps

• general:
• level: user
• personal:
• first name: manuel
• last name: lehmann
• portals:
• demozoo: profile
• cdcs:
• cdc #1: fr-063: Magellan by Farbrausch [web]

• 4k invitation procedural graphics Linux Kalk Kalling by Stargaze [web]
• Where is the Kölsch?
• rulezadded on the 2026-05-16 00:53:09
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Askr Yggdrasil by Farbrausch [web]
• release the kraken!
• rulezadded on the 2026-05-16 00:44:16
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Prohibited by 0b5vr
• holy moly
• rulezadded on the 2026-05-16 00:40:00
• 64k Linux Unfinished Evolution by Flaming Marshmellows
• Had to giggle at the horse.
• rulezadded on the 2026-04-30 15:40:51
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Entangled
• Quote:

  If a LLM is used in any way, shape or form, in the making of a prod - the prod is 100% irrelevant.

  
  That’s a very slippery slope. Where exactly do we draw the line?
  
  I understand the intention behind the criticism. Art as human expression is the heart of the scene. Without it, a demo is just a benchmark test. There is a deep-seated fear that the "suffering for the craft" is being lost. In our world, the value of a prod is often seen as proportional to the struggle of squeezing it into 4k. If AI removes that struggle, some feel cheated out of the "admiration for the effort."
  
  But:
  
  If an operating system or a compiler uses AI-optimized code, does that make every prod running on it... "irrelevant"? It's 2026. We are at this point already!
  
  In this case, the tool used to edit the sdfs was vibecoded (as a proof of concept, if I get this right...), but the image itself was crafted by BoyC. The composition, the lighting, and the artistic intent are human expressions, not the result of a prompt. (And I like it. ^^)
  
  If we follow this "all-or-nohting" logic, we would have to audit every single piece of software in our pipeline for hidden AI-generated snippets. What if a tool developer uses copilot for boilerplate code and doesn't disclose it? Does the art created with that tool suddenly lose its soul?
  
  Where is the line between the tool and the creative output? AI won't disappear just because people hate it. It will continue to integrate into our workflows, and in a few years, it will be nearly impossible to use a computer without interacting with some component that an AI (helped) build. That would mean the end of "Modern" Compos.
  
  There will be a point, where we have to decide, how to deal with this. I use AI to learn about techniques. But I enjoy, to write the code on my own. Hell! Am I poisened now in some way?
  
  If we lose the ability to distinguish between a tool and the artists intent, the scene is done. Full disclosure should be mandatory, though.
• isokadded on the 2026-04-27 20:10:54
• demo JavaScript Heart Of Glass by Gray Marchers [web] & Byterapers [web]
• Actually really kitschy. And I love everything about it.
• rulezadded on the 2026-04-12 18:18:06
• 4k procedural graphics Linux City At Night
• Love the fact, that this is a pure software renderer. Nice one!
• rulezadded on the 2026-04-11 12:29:20
• 4k procedural graphics Windows reliquary
• Love the texture work here! Would've been even better if the hands were SDFs too, but still a top-tier 4K.
• rulezadded on the 2026-04-11 12:25:30
• demo Amiga OCS/ECS Second Nature by Desire [web] & The Twitch Elite
• Just wow.
• rulezadded on the 2026-04-11 00:19:06
• wild Animation/Video amKIga by X-men
• amKIga!!!!!!
• rulezadded on the 2026-04-09 19:59:48