pouët.net

Go to bottom

scene music stolen

category: music [glöplog]
I commented on the third video listed by gaspode earlier today, and now it's listed as private. Commenting does get somewhere, I guess.
Quote:
No matter if sampling old or new, give credits where credits are due.


I don't think this is so important.
There are always people who like to do this kind of thing..searching sources.
It's sometimes fun but pointless to dwell on.

Like who did Edgar Froese copy to get his signature riffs?
It doesn't really matter. It's evolution of shared consciousness.

When creating your main goal is to do something new/flow/current not be a librarian.

Still it's nice to be credited.
And if your work has been of any value you will be credited.
Maybe not in the mainstream of things but in places like Pouet.
Asking for something more is just a child crying for attention.
(Waiting for the day Led Zeppelin comes out with an advertising campaing to tell from who they stole stairway to heaven)
added on the 2016-05-18 20:23:59 by 1in10 1in10
AIXELENT isn't really doing too much sampling for his visuals. It's more like copying large segments wholesale, flipping them, then turning down the contrast. I didn't exactly count, but I would guess some of them went on for longer than the maximum fair use limit. However I will grant his SoundCloud profile lists "AACHEN, Germany" which means such a US law doesn't apply, but it likely also means the law is more strict on copying.
So why isn´t the famous youtube banhammer engaged here?
Ripping audio is blocked, ripping visuals is ok...?
added on the 2016-05-18 21:01:56 by T$ T$
Come on..
Fuck the law.
It's for the servants of the rule.
What is "ok" is the guided vision of masses that have not reached consciousness.
added on the 2016-05-18 21:20:38 by 1in10 1in10
Quote:
Ripping audio is blocked, ripping visuals is ok...?

This is the reason why the visuals are flipped and edited with filters so the YT-video-algorythms can detect them.
added on the 2016-05-18 21:37:48 by gaspode gaspode
can = can't
added on the 2016-05-18 21:38:10 by gaspode gaspode
Also, ASD doesn't have a YouTube channel so they're not in the ContentID system.
added on the 2016-05-18 21:39:28 by Gargaj Gargaj
Quote:
Wasn't the end of this video by that guy also from a demo?


Yep, it's Conspiracy – One of these days the sky's gonna break
added on the 2016-05-18 21:40:42 by gaspode gaspode
Yay! I submitted my first ever YouTube copyright claim :D
added on the 2016-05-18 21:49:32 by Gargaj Gargaj
Feels good to finally be on the other side of those claims, eh? :D
"richtig ist es nicht. aber notwendig" ;)
added on the 2016-05-18 22:55:18 by T$ T$
Quote:
So why isn´t the famous youtube banhammer engaged here?
Ripping audio is blocked, ripping visuals is ok...?

Try posting a video with ripped Hollywood visuals, you might feel the "hammer" a bit sooner. :)
added on the 2016-05-19 10:31:56 by absence absence
BB Image
You can run...
added on the 2016-05-20 01:29:22 by Gargaj Gargaj
That is one of the raddest things I have seen in a while :D
Haha, oh wow :)
Should have asked nicely :p
added on the 2016-05-20 04:10:36 by numtek numtek
I commented on two of the videos and now they're both "Private". What a copout.
added on the 2016-05-20 10:22:52 by gloom gloom
*thumbup*
added on the 2016-05-20 16:06:15 by T$ T$
Worse than the original soundtrack and with added comic sans on top. How about... no? :)
added on the 2016-06-07 10:13:10 by Preacher Preacher
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIJ0qzZjoOo
go to 1:22
i think it used binary flow by conspiracy
added on the 2016-06-08 07:40:44 by Flashira Flashira
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jZXbhe6-rg
go to 0:17 i think it used same footage
added on the 2016-06-08 07:42:47 by Flashira Flashira
I don't know what I'm watching but it's so painful to me that I'd just submit a takedown request purely on that basis.
added on the 2016-06-08 10:01:03 by Preacher Preacher
Flashy: If you think a one second blurry shot of a wormhole is worth reporting and taking action over, then you're being a million times more petty and unreasonable than those record labels that took down the Revision DJ videos.
added on the 2016-06-08 10:52:30 by gasman gasman
...but only because their algorithms don't work yet with one second snippets ;)

login

Go to top