scene music stolen
category: music [glöplog]
I commented on the third video listed by gaspode earlier today, and now it's listed as private. Commenting does get somewhere, I guess.
Quote:
No matter if sampling old or new, give credits where credits are due.
I don't think this is so important.
There are always people who like to do this kind of thing..searching sources.
It's sometimes fun but pointless to dwell on.
Like who did Edgar Froese copy to get his signature riffs?
It doesn't really matter. It's evolution of shared consciousness.
When creating your main goal is to do something new/flow/current not be a librarian.
Still it's nice to be credited.
And if your work has been of any value you will be credited.
Maybe not in the mainstream of things but in places like Pouet.
Asking for something more is just a child crying for attention.
(Waiting for the day Led Zeppelin comes out with an advertising campaing to tell from who they stole stairway to heaven)
AIXELENT isn't really doing too much sampling for his visuals. It's more like copying large segments wholesale, flipping them, then turning down the contrast. I didn't exactly count, but I would guess some of them went on for longer than the maximum fair use limit. However I will grant his SoundCloud profile lists "AACHEN, Germany" which means such a US law doesn't apply, but it likely also means the law is more strict on copying.
So why isn´t the famous youtube banhammer engaged here?
Ripping audio is blocked, ripping visuals is ok...?
Ripping audio is blocked, ripping visuals is ok...?
Come on..
Fuck the law.
It's for the servants of the rule.
What is "ok" is the guided vision of masses that have not reached consciousness.
Fuck the law.
It's for the servants of the rule.
What is "ok" is the guided vision of masses that have not reached consciousness.
Quote:
Ripping audio is blocked, ripping visuals is ok...?
This is the reason why the visuals are flipped and edited with filters so the YT-video-algorythms can detect them.
can = can't
Also, ASD doesn't have a YouTube channel so they're not in the ContentID system.
Quote:
Wasn't the end of this video by that guy also from a demo?
Yep, it's Conspiracy – One of these days the sky's gonna break
Yay! I submitted my first ever YouTube copyright claim :D
Feels good to finally be on the other side of those claims, eh? :D
"richtig ist es nicht. aber notwendig" ;)
Quote:
So why isn´t the famous youtube banhammer engaged here?
Ripping audio is blocked, ripping visuals is ok...?
Try posting a video with ripped Hollywood visuals, you might feel the "hammer" a bit sooner. :)
You can run...
That is one of the raddest things I have seen in a while :D
Haha, oh wow :)
Should have asked nicely :p
Should have asked nicely :p
I commented on two of the videos and now they're both "Private". What a copout.
*thumbup*
Worse than the original soundtrack and with added comic sans on top. How about... no? :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIJ0qzZjoOo
go to 1:22
i think it used binary flow by conspiracy
go to 1:22
i think it used binary flow by conspiracy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jZXbhe6-rg
go to 0:17 i think it used same footage
go to 0:17 i think it used same footage
I don't know what I'm watching but it's so painful to me that I'd just submit a takedown request purely on that basis.
Flashy: If you think a one second blurry shot of a wormhole is worth reporting and taking action over, then you're being a million times more petty and unreasonable than those record labels that took down the Revision DJ videos.
...but only because their algorithms don't work yet with one second snippets ;)