fix me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
There is a problem with this prod:
Not a cracktro, it's a game.
Not a cracktro, it's a game.
fixed
el topo: next time use the change request system plz...
havoc: Sure, I didn't realize you could make a request for prod type change there.
britelite: seems something fishy is going on with those prods indeed. unfortunately i'm too busy this weekend to properly investigate so this'll have to wait until early next week (unless another gloperator figures it out before that time).
just had a look. the one goes to a 401mb .adf and the other one with the dead dl link has a link on the yt video to a 1.6mb file so any varifying if that one is legit would be good. i'd just delete it since it looks like they don't have a scene connection anyway.
@havoc is there a chance to activate some Atari 7800 prods uploaded by me?
i guess by activate you mean to add 7800 as a platform? like i said on december 15 in that other thread in response to your question, we want to see a bunch more proper demos for 7800 before we add it as a platform. i don't think those demos have been released since then ;)
i deleted 2 of the 3 acorn things since indeed fake dl links, yt videos deactivated and overall a mess.
@havoc
I don't mean a new platform "7800" (yep let's wait for more demos) but just visibility on the "Wild" list.
I can't see them: https://www.pouet.net/prodlist.php?platform[]=Wild
I don't mean a new platform "7800" (yep let's wait for more demos) but just visibility on the "Wild" list.
I can't see them: https://www.pouet.net/prodlist.php?platform[]=Wild
@sensenstahl
that one deleted by you doesn't look fake, and results are really impressive.
But I you're right binaries should be attached.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCk9zLezklA
that one deleted by you doesn't look fake, and results are really impressive.
But I you're right binaries should be attached.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCk9zLezklA
even though if it was not fake the dl link was pointing to a file that simply did not exist on the given url nor was it listed in the prod section of the given site. so adding a prod lacking basic requirements does not make that much sense since it happened 3 times in a row.
blast: i'm not quite sure what your are asking me to do. yes there are no 7800 prods on the first page in the Wild category prodlist right now. but what you see there is just the most recent additions sorted by date. if you'd like to see a "separate area" for 7800 prods why not make a list? that'll help arguing the case for a platform icon as well, and more so the bigger the list gets :)
@havoc
ok, I see now, by default that list is soreted by "release date" not by "added".
That's fine for me now.
ok, I see now, by default that list is soreted by "release date" not by "added".
That's fine for me now.
There is no problem with this prod: ; the link is no longe rbroken
i nudged it now but if it comes back you probably want to look at your server ;)
For this production: https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=88036
Can you please change the download link to http://home.sm41.de/tek/tools/webdiskwriter.lha. It will automatically point to the most recent version then. Thx, kind regards.
Can you please change the download link to http://home.sm41.de/tek/tools/webdiskwriter.lha. It will automatically point to the most recent version then. Thx, kind regards.
There is a problem with this party: it should be named "Borderline Compo" (or even just "Borderline"), without a year in the party series name.
100bit: done
bifat: done. you can also use "edit" on the prod page for most requests (such as changing the download link)
bifat: done. you can also use "edit" on the prod page for most requests (such as changing the download link)
There is a problem with this prod: The adf in the zip download is a completely different prod.
maybe krabob can tell you why he decided to spread the demo in that form, with indeed a misleading adf in the package
@havoc, I quickly created a working adf today because a friend requested me to do so. Wanted to add the link to it today, but it got rejected. If you want I can resubmit - just an offer (some people prefer adf over files), otherwise no problem, just let me know.
that rejection was because the image was hosted on googledrive. if that same adf image would have been on a reliable host (amigascne.org seems to make the most sense here) we would gladly accept it.
nightshft: just submit it again, i'll grab the file and put it on untergrund.net