Monopoly platforms and running demos
category: general [glöplog]
I'm pretty sure that anything but those "ad-hoc" signatures that are only valid on your own machine requires a 100$/year developer account.
Quote:
If it does not cost money to me, I'm happy to sign any executable I code before distributing it. Anyways, I should appear in the credits ;)
s/money/bytes/
Using an ad-hoc signature for other people to run the code will not work if I understand it correctly.
Quote:
The answer is clearly to distribute demos in sourcecode form then.
that's exactly what i do for my ios demos as a contingency plan for whenever apple decides to not allow demos on the app store anymore :)
Quote:
Using an ad-hoc signature for other people to run the code will not work if I understand it correctly.
are you sure? there's still the notarization hurdle either way
Quote:
are you sure? there's still the notarization hurdle either way
No I'm not so regard my statements as coming from my rear end :) I base it on this quote:
https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/unsigned.html
Code:
I didn't test ad-hoc signing before, because I didn't realize there would be difference. After all, ad-hoc signing is specifically designed for running software "locally", in other words, on your own Mac, not on someone else's Mac. As far as I know, it's not intended for software distribution.So perhaps it is possible.
Quote:
s/money/bytes/
Looking forward to Signckler, where your Ed25519 signature can overlap the relocation table and/or be used as note data for your synth.
