pouët.net

Go to bottom

DiHalt 2018, july, 7th - 8th, RU

category: parties [glöplog]
Somebody has wet dreams about sexy girls, and somebody has wet dreams about disqualifying us from somewhere for a year.
Getting disqualification for breaking absolutely no rules would have raised our performance to a new level of absurd, making it even better than planned in the beginning.

It's hard to understand this fact if you are dumb, but it's really obvious.
Quote:
Getting disqualification for breaking absolutely no rules would have raised our performance to a new level of absurd

...or preselection? That's a rule.
added on the 2018-07-14 14:47:37 by Gargaj Gargaj
Preselection is not a disqualifying. Preselection can be based on a quality of submitted entries, and having an insufficient quality is not a rules breaking.
The problem really is that technically the quality of our entries was really average and usual for many of ZX compos. And if we would have fallen under preselection, other entries of the similar quality should be preselected as well, leaving only 2 or 3 entries for a whole competition. Or may be one? Or zero at all? This depends on expert who would have done the preselection.
And even if all of our entries would have been preselected, the manifesto would remain. Preselected works even would have been distributed with the compo pack. May be that would have been a healthier outcome, but it wouldn't affect us too much really.
lol. I know how preselection works: jerks grom Hype pass conversions of diver4d etc.
added on the 2018-07-14 15:54:37 by g0blinish g0blinish
if the quality is so bad, why not just make one good entry and win?
added on the 2018-07-14 16:03:41 by HellMood HellMood
they are pussy what painting loose ar compo, e.g. at Forever.
added on the 2018-07-14 16:12:31 by g0blinish g0blinish
What if it's not about winning?
it's about showing the bad quality, I got that. one good entry and winning would have shown that as well. now it looks like you tried to win with bad entries over even worse ones, and failed despite sending 20+ entries ^^
added on the 2018-07-14 16:23:55 by HellMood HellMood
not about winning? rofl

two or three years ago random (an orginizer of Chaos Constructions) claimed "no copy accepted". Some submission has been rejected. But at this time orgs accepted diver4d entry:
https://zxart.ee/rus/avtory/d/diver/mercenary-5-clone-warrior/

of course he won, like next year.

Orgs explained as "He is an old man, he deserved it".

So, all point of action: to claim preselect and choose only friend's entries to get a prizes.

they are ruined the scene.
added on the 2018-07-14 16:58:25 by g0blinish g0blinish
So, let me sum this up. Every party where g0blinish isn't winning has rigged voting. You are a sore loser, mate.
added on the 2018-07-14 17:07:41 by introspec introspec
гомоспек завали ебальник, я тебе не дружище.
added on the 2018-07-14 17:15:27 by g0blinish g0blinish
Try communicating in English, mate.
added on the 2018-07-14 18:16:11 by introspec introspec
Quote:
Preselection is not a disqualifying. Preselection can be based on a quality of submitted entries, and having an insufficient quality is not a rules breaking.
The problem really is that technically the quality of our entries was really average and usual for many of ZX compos. And if we would have fallen under preselection, other entries of the similar quality should be preselected as well, leaving only 2 or 3 entries for a whole competition. Or may be one? Or zero at all? This depends on expert who would have done the preselection.
And even if all of our entries would have been preselected, the manifesto would remain. Preselected works even would have been distributed with the compo pack. May be that would have been a healthier outcome, but it wouldn't affect us too much really.

Hm, so your argument is that the quality average is low, and thus there's a lot of "filler" in the compos?
added on the 2018-07-14 18:44:17 by Gargaj Gargaj
Quote:
Try communicating in English, mate.


I am not mate to you.

я не держал свечку при твоем зачатии, но наверняка твоя мамаша-блядюга высрала тебя в унитаз. Отсюда и выросло такое смердящее говно. И как бы ты не старался, а свой запах ты не скроешь.

Тебе не с кем поговорить? иди высрись на хуйп, авось лайков наберешь.

BB Image
всё, конец дискуссии.
added on the 2018-07-14 19:10:13 by g0blinish g0blinish
This is great perfomance ever!

P.S. g0blinish, relax please, mate.
added on the 2018-07-14 19:39:51 by nyuk nyuk
To anyone who asked what is the problem with the Russian ZX scene, here is an explanation:

Every second comment is by g0blinish
and every single one of his comments is well beyond decent.
This is why there is nothing of substance discussed in public anymore.

If he were to write the same kind of stuff in English, he would have been banned here already.
added on the 2018-07-14 19:43:37 by introspec introspec
He used to be, but I'm literally Gahndi.
added on the 2018-07-14 19:48:25 by Gargaj Gargaj
I did not suggest you should stop being Gahndi :)

I did suggest that the problem with the Russian scene is kind of staring back at you.
added on the 2018-07-14 19:58:10 by introspec introspec
Quote:
it's about showing the bad quality, I got that. one good entry and winning would have shown that as well. now it looks like you tried to win with bad entries over even worse ones, and failed despite sending 20+ entries ^^

Nope, it's not about the bad quality. It's about a lack of expectations used by us for our amusement.

Quote:
Hm, so your argument is that the quality average is low, and thus there's a lot of "filler" in the compos?

We are not really making any statements with our work. We made it because it is art, it is something you cannot leave unmade and just live a full life. It is not an act to improve something positively or to demonstrate something. We've observed the situation which disgusts and scares us for a long time and we nabaged to turned it upside down, connecting viewers, votes, authors and pixel art in a one project. We didn't just submit 29 images, we have submitted one large inseparable entry. Our attempt to innovate is not really making some social/scene argument, it's an attempt to break the template of one entry == one art act.
We made it not to improve the situation, but to express the emotion. You can summarize it as "we are crazy enough to spend significant efforts in doing all sorts of deliberately bad art to pull the viewers out of zone of comfort at last".
It's a ring of bad practice: weak expectations lead to weak works, leading to weak party rules with no preselect leading to weak works leading to weak expectations. You can't break the ring, but you can try to make an art of it.
not constructive enough for me. do good stuff, win compos, raise expectations that way. sounds easier for me ;)
added on the 2018-07-14 23:11:30 by HellMood HellMood
Constructiveness is great for politics, but it's not mandatory for an art.
Quote:
We are not really making any statements with our work. We made it because it is art

That sounds contradictory to me - if you publish your work, aren't you automatically also making a statement?

Mind you, I dig the idea, I just wanna understand more of the context.
added on the 2018-07-15 00:25:02 by Gargaj Gargaj
i art because i am
or something like that
added on the 2018-07-15 01:37:34 by psenough psenough
moroz99, simple question to you: how do you think what prods conversion or painting:


https://demozoo.org/graphics/182151/

https://demozoo.org/graphics/162281/

https://demozoo.org/graphics/159994/

https://demozoo.org/graphics/152419/

?
added on the 2018-07-15 05:59:16 by g0blinish g0blinish
so you dont like it that there is a huge pile of shit, to demonstrate your opinion you throw even more shit on top, then jump on it, and complain that it stinks.

gotta love spectrum people
added on the 2018-07-15 16:31:04 by groepaz groepaz

login

Go to top