pouët.net

atom: please use the remove existing credit function available in the submit changes, then we will process them asap

There is a problem with this prod: It should be of type "Demo" and "32k", as is custom for VCS demos of this size. (Right now it's only of type 32k).

Thanks!

done

There is a problem with this prod: ...

This is not our prod

Well, looks like your first prod was added to the wrong group and so was the second. I could just create a new group for you guys and move your prods there...

Just not sure what to call it in order to distinguish it from the other "Dream" :D

There is a problem with this prod: ...
It should be in category "falcon demo", not combined demo, sorry for the mistake m(_ _)m

Fixed.

hello! could someone please update the URL for Vantage to http://www.vantage.rocks? Thank you!!

done :)

WTF you're insanely fast :-) Thanks!!

Can you please change the rank of this prod to "not applicable", because it was neither "disqualified" nor "not shown". The organizers only decided to cancel the counted votes later on because the hardware had issues and they didn't want to be unfair.

Changed.

JAC!: I figured that if votes have been counted for a prod but the organisers cancelled those votes, they thereby essentially disqualified the prod from appearing in the rankings as it would have in case the votes had not been cancelled. I realize that the term "disqualifcation" has a negative connotation for most people, but it is the correct term for what happened with this prod. Perhaps a good comparison would be the automatic disqualification from record lists in sprinting events when tailwind exceeds 2m/s- neither the organisers nor the competitors can be blamed for that situation, but despite that fact a disqualification is the end result.

(Changed it back.)

Fatality (ZX) is the same group as Fatality

they worked on ZX then moved to GBC, so they can be named as "Fatality (ZX, GBC)" and glued together.

I second JAC!. AD:6502 (Arsantica 2) by Desire _WASN'T_ disqualified. As organiser I kindly ask You to "not applicable". Thank You.

to change it to "not applicable" even. sorry.

Please delete the "old" SV2k14 results file and put this one:

http://www.sillyventure.eu/download/sv2k14results.txt

Thank You.

SV again:
this prod has the wrong compo selected. as it being a VCS one the correct compo is "console demo" (although that is also hard to distuingish from jaguar prods... do the atari-compos need to be subdivided?? ;)

@wysiwtf: you are obviously right ;) please fix it as well :) to "console demo" :)

done

bump

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=61633 add group http://www.pouet.net/groups.php?which=12200

Due to recent changes, some internal links are now broken
in the thread http://www.pouet.net/topic.php?which=10164
can someone please replace the following image links
https://www.pouet.net/content/screenshots/64484.gif
https://www.pouet.net/content/screenshots/63522.gif
https://www.pouet.net/content/screenshots/64159.jpg
with
https://www.pouet.net/content/files/screenshots/00064/00064484.gif
https://www.pouet.net/content/files/screenshots/00063/00063522.gif
https://www.pouet.net/content/files/screenshots/00064/00064159.jpg
that'd be nice =)

There is a problem with this prod: According to the comment here on the same prod, that prod shouldn't have a rank. It's listed as 1st, but as not participating in a compo. Doesn't make a lot of sense that way.