pouët.net

Yup, done.

replace http://www.pouet.net/party_results.php?which=1675&when=2014 with http://arkt.is/results.txt please? (I got a little too adventurous with unicode, it seems). Thanks

done, but doesnt seem to change much :/

https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=46186 is a dupe of https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=41156

they are both credited to different groups, according to csdb it is a coop, tho.

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=60558 remix of http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=56935

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=62504 dupe of http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=52652

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=62511 dupe http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=62525
please delete the second one

haha, i had a weird feeling of deja vu while accepting the credits

also, done

A dupe of Flashback.

errr, wtf, pretty sure i removed that o_O

well, done

^^

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=24908 platform: windows

right

Please, correct this one with:
1. Name - "the humbLe guys", not "the humbKe guys";
2. Group - "THG" group should be added.

Thank you =).

fixed, danke le sim.

Hi
Please fix following to this prod

Add type "demo"
Add "Mac OSX Intel" Platform

Thx

Please fix RTX1911's website

to http://www.rtx1911.net/RTX1911/

Thx

ok then

Plus/4 port link broken?

luca, i just confirmed all credits you added but i'm not touching your requests to remove port links. you say the ports are not exact, fair enough i'd say, but it's a different system they're running on so naturally there'll be some differences no matter how. the question should be, how recognizable is it that the authors of the port have tried to emulate the original? without watching the prods there seem to be clear connections so i remain reluctant to accept your requests. can you fill me in on how things compare in the actual demos? do they look equally similar as (for example) the second reality ports? thanks :)

havoc, those links are absolutely unrelated from their c64 counterparts, for several reasons that hare differently evaluable demo by demo: some are quite similar to the c64 ones but essentially badly hacked by proper +4 groups and they come erroneously as released under the original c64 group, totally false overall because a real conversion is something like Marq did for The First Ball demo, to have a clear good example; some are completely different; some take just the effect but in a completely different demo's environment. In no case, the origina c64l authors have admittely signed those so-called conversions.

at ecc, please change party from "European Computer Conference" to "ECC" (where all the other entries are).

Sorry, prod link should be http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=49737