|
Suboceanic Reimagined by Tomasz Dobrowolski
[nfo]
|
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 39% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: n/a |
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
added on the 2026-02-22 19:05:53 by tomkh  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
Well, shouldn't it be 64K?
added on the 2026-02-22 19:55:54 by fizzer 
fizzer: it would be nice to fit a video model with this level of fidelity under 64k, but then I would surely release it in "demo/intro" category, not in "Wild with AI".
FIIIIIIIRST
It's pretty amazing what these statistical models can do nowadays. I sort of wanted to give +1 because it was not bugging too much (atleast watching it once) and I sorta understand the excitement as an old procgen enthusiast.
..but. It's probably fine as a wild, but I have to say that I'm disappointed that this was just using those 3rdparty models. So it's not your own work, except resampling the good shots and then combining them on the video. I would loved to see you distill the models to produce this kind of quality in say 10 megs or so.
..but. It's probably fine as a wild, but I have to say that I'm disappointed that this was just using those 3rdparty models. So it's not your own work, except resampling the good shots and then combining them on the video. I would loved to see you distill the models to produce this kind of quality in say 10 megs or so.
It's certainly your right to do it.
But man, when I saw the A/B pics you showed a few days ago (wherever I saw that), of screens from this shown against screens from the original prod.. I thought this was an absolute tour de force of showing how your skills, plus the tech, had advanced in the intervening years.
So, now I'm sad. The realisation of what was actually going on was one the sadder collisions I've experienced of Good Old Stiff Upper-Lip Scening, against what someone else described as stochastic echoes in idea-space.
I don't think we've met, and somehow I don't like to thumb down someone I haven't looked in the eye, but this has made me feel ick.
But man, when I saw the A/B pics you showed a few days ago (wherever I saw that), of screens from this shown against screens from the original prod.. I thought this was an absolute tour de force of showing how your skills, plus the tech, had advanced in the intervening years.
So, now I'm sad. The realisation of what was actually going on was one the sadder collisions I've experienced of Good Old Stiff Upper-Lip Scening, against what someone else described as stochastic echoes in idea-space.
I don't think we've met, and somehow I don't like to thumb down someone I haven't looked in the eye, but this has made me feel ick.
Fell: this is indeed not a demonstration of my skills, but a "performance art" of sort. I explicitly labelled everything. Also from the first seconds there is a full disclaimer that I did "next to nothing" over here. Sorry, if this was confusing in any way.
It's a commentary on modern times.
Please judge it appropriately.
It's a commentary on modern times.
Please judge it appropriately.
So, I’m wondering. Did you enjoy making this as much as you enjoyed making the original? Or even more perhaps? Also, how is it in the ‘sense of accomplishment’ department? The original vs. remake? I’m genuinely interested. Thanks.
4gentE: no sense of accomplishment whatsoever. Again, "I did next to nothing". But as a viewer, I actually do like the outcome ;)
Thumb up for having the balls to submit an AI-prod :)
Fun to watch, curious about the whole pipeline, if you care to document it... :)
Fun to watch, curious about the whole pipeline, if you care to document it... :)
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !