pouët.net

Go to bottom

lotek style: help me find more atari classics!!

category: general [glöplog]
pc has second reality
BB Image
amiga has hardwired
BB Image
atari has this cool demo...
BB Image

IS THERE MORE COOL DEMOS LIKE THIS AT ATARI. I NEVER UNDERSTOOD WHY AMIGA DUDES ARE CALLING ATARI DUDES LAMERS :((( THIS SHIT IS WONDERFUL!!!
added on the 2006-02-05 17:37:51 by uns3en_ uns3en_
WONDERFUL SHIT OMG.1..§1! ATARI SCENE I LOVE YAH.
added on the 2006-02-05 17:47:34 by iks iks
My god Maali, haven't you heard of safe sex?

BB Image
added on the 2006-02-05 17:56:55 by sparcus sparcus
Besides the sick controversial content, this thing does not belong here anyway. I have never heard of this "crew" up until now and releasing a sick compilation of pictures on a disk does not necessarily qualify as a demoscene production.

I'm changing those screenshots, I have had enough with these pictures.
added on the 2006-02-05 18:13:50 by keops keops
Thanks for proving my point that censorship sucks, Keops. I noticed you only changed the screenshots of the Kink-O-Rama productions and not the one of the Centerfold production. Simple porn is ok and bestiality and fist fucking is not?

As soon as people start drawing lines there will be discussion about where to draw that line. There should be only one line here at pouet, and that's between demoscene and non-scene productions, so if there really is no link with the scene for these productions they should just be removed. If they stay then there should be a way for people to decide for themselves whether they want to see the shots or not, like discussed in the other censorship thread.

(Note that I'm playing advocate of the devil here btw, I agree that these productions suck and I have doubts about their scene relevance, but the issue of censorship is definately worth discussing :-)
added on the 2006-02-05 18:48:13 by sparcus sparcus
sparcus: i have simple question? do you like fucking dogs? i guess not. then its okay to remove the prod ;)
added on the 2006-02-05 18:52:11 by uns3en_ uns3en_
and iam really sorry, this topic was just lame provocation...
added on the 2006-02-05 18:52:34 by uns3en_ uns3en_
Quote:
Simple porn is ok and bestiality and fist fucking is not?
How about child porn? Rape?

If the line has to be drawn somewhere, why not draw it at "willing human adults doing what they want to do"?
added on the 2006-02-05 18:55:39 by Preacher Preacher
Preacher: You are right, let me correct that: there should be two lines, the line between scene and non-scene productions and the line between legal and illegal pictures.

However, is fist-fucking illegal?
added on the 2006-02-05 19:03:05 by sparcus sparcus
Sparcus: I did not try to prove any point. I don't have the option to remove those prods, otherwise I would have gladly done it. I changed the most offensive screenshots the best way I could to accomodate most people.

More importantly, I don't fuck dogs. Do you? I'm afraid a line has to be drawn, eventually.
added on the 2006-02-05 19:05:37 by keops keops
unseen, may i suggest: DTVM...
added on the 2006-02-05 19:06:14 by havoc havoc
Keops/UNS3EN: Don't pull a Bush on me, I'm against censorship so I must be a dogfucker? Come on guys, you can bring up better arguments than that...
added on the 2006-02-05 19:07:57 by sparcus sparcus
IN SOVIET RUSSIA DOGS FUCK YOU!
Quote:

I changed the most offensive screenshots the best way I could to accomodate most people.


And btw, most people didn't seem to have a problem with it, I only see a small minority who is offended (and most amusing of all like usually is the case with people who are easily offended: In their quest to censor things they draw more attention to it while nobody would have noticed if they just let it be :-)
added on the 2006-02-05 19:10:36 by sparcus sparcus
sparcus: learn to read, those were 2 different sentences with 2 different points. I did not insert any connection such as "so" in between.

Now, I'm fed up arguing about that, if you want the old sick screenshots back with dogs fucking girls, go ahead, you are a gloperator. If you want the prods removed, ask ps. I'm done here.
added on the 2006-02-05 19:12:12 by keops keops
Meuh Keops, I fully support your way, as some so called sceners already did "demos" with child porn (as seen on PC) or rassistic contents, so drawing a line between scene/non-scene doesn´t work out anymore. I have to say it would be better to do at least some bits of self-censorship here before some frontiers will be broken that will damage the image of the whole demoscene at all... we should try to remember that demo making is doing "digital art" and i hardly doubt that slideshows with bestiality, s/m, rassistic contents and so on can be called -art- at all... think about it!
added on the 2006-02-05 21:43:38 by moondog moondog
unseen fate:

The way you are acting now, just gives prove to my statement.

thank you ;)
added on the 2006-02-05 22:06:13 by ltk_tscc ltk_tscc
sorry man for real... it was lame provocation
added on the 2006-02-05 22:08:31 by uns3en_ uns3en_
unseen fate:

Most of your comments on pouet seem to be provocations. I mostly cannot find any sense in all your comments.

Is it cool to thumb something down just because everybody else is thumbing it up and it ranks #1 on the pouet top 10? Is it some new finnish "art"-project to just find good prods shit and the worst shit (e.g. fake/porn/wild/whatever IMHO NON-DEMOSCENE prods even if they are done by so called sceners) gets a thumb up?

added on the 2006-02-05 22:17:22 by ltk_tscc ltk_tscc
Quote:

I have to say it would be better to do at least some bits of self-censorship here before some frontiers will be broken that will damage the image of the whole demoscene at all...


Oh come on, note that a lot of this offensive stuff (the porn demos, but I'm also thinking about the slideshow with all the death people which was added to pouet not long ago) is very old and dates back to the late 80's/early 90's, and it never hurted the scene before.

Quote:

we should try to remember that demo making is doing "digital art" and i hardly doubt that slideshows with bestiality, s/m, rassistic contents and so on can be called -art- at all... think about it!


I totaly agree with you, but it's not up to you or me to decide what's art or not, that should anyone make out for himself.
added on the 2006-02-05 22:27:36 by sparcus sparcus
I think it's always the critics - in this case, us - who decide what's art or not. And not always the creators. So go on and judge :)
added on the 2006-02-05 23:02:46 by kelsey kelsey
critics can only disapprove that it's art, which is just another personal opinion.
Augh, is this now turning into a "What's art?" discussion? Please let's not go there and quote wikipedia's page about art instead ;-)

Quote:

The neutrality of this article is disputed.
added on the 2006-02-05 23:10:04 by sparcus sparcus
but with experience and reason behind it.
hehe, well, that might not stand for the whole scene - i'm rather inexperienced, too.
seriously, if everyone goes around saying "who am i to judge" things just get fucked up in the end.
added on the 2006-02-05 23:14:29 by kelsey kelsey

login

Go to top