pouët.net

Go to bottom

Annoying Users

category: general [glöplog]
This is subjective!

There are a lot of guys here who are annoying to some people and not to others. I'm not the only one to start pointless threads and post pics.

Most of my annoying threads are constructive discussions about the scene anyway but loads of the users here are too narrowminded to even see that.

I also think that pornstars should include people who upload demos with porn in them!!
There should be a category for pathetic whining nerd too!
Quote:
There should be a category for pathetic whining nerd too!

sorry shane, but you can only have one category and i think annoyinguser fits you better than whiningnerd. ;D
added on the 2005-01-25 19:08:51 by madMixx madMixx
Quote:
I'm not the only one to start pointless threads and post pics.

At least you admit it...
added on the 2005-01-25 19:12:52 by Gargaj Gargaj
i agree that annoyance is subjective, which is why i urge people to use the css trickery described on the faq instead of the features implemented thru account2.php.

the pr0nstahr category was started as a joke and is the reason why i decided to revert it to its previous users only.

i'll be using annoyinguser to label users that abuse pr0n or simply rant alot of crap, that a vast majority of the pouet readers wouldnt care about, when they are bored and/or drunk.

do notice that annoyinguser was created for my sole abuse and not for the pleasure of other users. im just tired of reading shit all the time when trying to spend time working on the actual site. its distracting, sometimes disturbing and deniflty annoying. call me a fascist or whatever you want, im just tired of egocentrical mental diahrea and lack of civil communicative skills.

also, the reason there are not more categories such as "pathetic looser", "pr0n poster", "egocentric maniac", "lobsterbait", "clueless panamerican" etc etc etc is that it would require more php+sql work then im willing to waste on such idiots, extra db space and more dropdownboxes.

i rather waste time implementing the stuff on the todo list.

sorry if i insulted anyone, you just annoy me, nothing personal, im sure i manage to annoy you back plenty of times aswell, feel free to hate me for public demonstrating my underappreciation for your virtual presence. -_-
added on the 2005-01-25 19:15:22 by psenough psenough
:B
Hooray for annoyed admins! \\o/
added on the 2005-01-25 20:41:14 by kb_ kb_
Hmmm...I see a flaw.
me too.

Quote:
i agree that annoyance is subjective, which is why i urge people to use the css trickery described on the faq instead of the features implemented thru account2.php.

opposed to
Quote:
do notice that annoyinguser was created for my sole abuse and not for the pleasure of other users.


(i'm not complaining tho - can't really care)
added on the 2005-01-25 21:09:12 by Gargaj Gargaj
it would be nice to see those new user levels explained on FAQ section :)
added on the 2005-01-25 21:15:14 by EviL EviL
Who cares? pouet =! your life.


Well at least I hope so.
added on the 2005-01-25 21:21:27 by freeze freeze
true true pouet is full of shit I know...
I just dont get what a gloperator is and what can do
annoyinguser I think I got it...
that pronstar is what ?
I am just curious :D
added on the 2005-01-25 21:23:34 by EviL EviL
shane is the most unneeded human in the whole life
added on the 2005-01-25 21:25:16 by mrdoob mrdoob
I think shanes mental age decreased by 15 years, just minutes ago.
added on the 2005-01-25 21:27:24 by Stelthzje Stelthzje
impossible, mental ages can't be negative
added on the 2005-01-25 21:28:31 by sparcus sparcus
i'm a annoyinguser so i got shamelessly censored, if you're registered you can uncensor my level's posts here
Here's what is so stupid. You are censoring my opinions and statements, but I'm still here taking up space.

I won't call anyone a nazi but it is very sad that people can get so worked up over someone with different opinions. Very sad.
shane: wanna bet that you'll get your account nuked in, say, 30 minutes if you keep doing it? :)
added on the 2005-01-25 21:40:30 by Gargaj Gargaj
Yeah, it won't surprise me. First censorship, then banning.

They always said they believed in free speech and yet here I am making them go back on their values!!! I take a lot of satisfaction from that!

I haven't even done anything explicit or offensive and I have them questioning their own values!

Maybe after all this time Pouet was MY experiment.
haha. say hello to your new optimus-mood shanemeister!
added on the 2005-01-25 21:47:13 by dalezr dalezr
man, am i really in the same category as him? bless me :P

and yeh.. ps wants ppl to use the css-trick for hiding annoying fellas, yet apparently he hasnt mastered the trick himself yet, hence he couldve ignored me, shane, whoever already for weeks, YET he makes a annoyingusers category...

one more thing, ps, why do you decide for _all_ pouet users? i mean, ok, it's nice that you maintain this place and stuff, but as you said yourself, this act is purely something egocentric and thus not in line with IMHO the public service this place offers. Anyway, you'll prolly give me the same old 'but we host/maintain it, so im the boss'-argumentation back, so im not even going to argue.

this act of yours is just as pathetic on your end as whatever the annoying users were/will be doing.. i think more ppl will agree on that.
maali: i only turn it on when im on dev mood, i need it off during "normal" hours.. too lazy to restart browsers and edit .css's all the time.
added on the 2005-01-25 21:51:07 by psenough psenough
I wonder how he copes in the real world. There are a lot of annoying people out there. Maybe he doesn't. Maybe it's too scary for him.
in the real world, you can usually walk away from annoying people.
added on the 2005-01-25 21:56:05 by jazzman jazzman
pathetic people demand pathetic solutions.

like i said, i dont encourage anyone to use the annoyinguser feature. i rather see ppl use the css thing instead. i just had to implement the annoyinguser thing couz ep was getting overly retarded. and judging from the reactions i been getting from shane and you, im glad i included you both in it aswell.

its not a matter of showing control or not, its a matter of _needing_ to have it for the sake of sanity. there are some too many sick people in this world who speak first and consider it beeing reasonable or even logical after. and although i often include myself in the unreasonable bunch, forcing our points of view on others and annoying them to hell when they disagree or insult you for beeing a dick brings no resolution to any debate.

as much as i love the

Q: "stupid useless question!"
A: BASS
A: NAKED CHICKS!
A: MORE DRUGS!
A: IM A RETARD!
A: SO AM I!

kinda threads i rather be able to just ignore them all together.

i _want_ to use it. if others use it or not thats up to them, statistics will show hardly anyone will be using the hideannoyingusers feature except ofcourse when the retards rebel and decide to make even more annoyance then usual which only proves my point to begin with: that these users are prone to random outbursts of annoying behaviour.
added on the 2005-01-25 21:58:13 by psenough psenough

login

Go to top