p01 information 5251 glöps
- general:
- level: user
- personal:
- first name: mathieu
- last name: henri
- portals:
- demozoo: profile
- cdcs:
- cdc #1: Flip-O-Demo by Oxygene [web] & Diamond Design
- cdc #2: Ooh Crikey Wot A Scorcher by The Lost Boys
- cdc #3: Blood by Holocaust [web]
- cdc #4: Cuddly Demos by The Carebears [web]
- cdc #5: The Union Demo by The Union
- cdc #6: Fantasia by Dune & Sector One [web]
- cdc #7: Flashback by The Carebears [web]
- 512b JavaScript [TheDarkTiger]
for the two hidden ads on the page and less importantly for not working in 2 out of 3 rendering engines implementing Canvas.- sucksadded on the 2009-11-12 14:15:17
- 512b JavaScript [TheDarkTiger]
- I don't get the same effect as pictured in the screenshot in Chrome or Opera. Only in Firefox :\
Also I'm really skeptical about all the crap in that page.
JS prods always took all assets into consideration: HTML, CSS, images, ... - isokadded on the 2009-11-12 10:31:48
- 512b JavaScript JSpongy by Ribbon [web]
- Tell me about it :p
And Carakan, Opera's new JS engine with JIT and co. , will certainly wait for the next major release. :\ - isokadded on the 2009-11-11 16:21:58
- demo invitation Windows Pimp My Squid! by Northern Dragons [web]
- \\(o_O)//
- rulezadded on the 2009-11-10 09:17:46
- wild Animation/Video Demoscene in 2 minutes by Damones [web] & Accession
- -_-
- sucksadded on the 2009-11-03 17:27:06
- 1k ZX-81 Piss 1K by johny.noone
- sucksadded on the 2009-11-02 14:20:24
- 512b JavaScript JSpongy by Ribbon [web]
- tomaes: I know it's dog slow in Opera 10. That's why I recommended Chrome 3+ & Firefox 3.5+ although my default browser is Opera.
FWIW, using an internal build of Opera I got a framerate pretty similar to what I get in Chrome. - isokadded on the 2009-10-26 14:03:55
- 512b JavaScript JSpongy by Ribbon [web]
- o_O slow ?
I get 15 to 30 fps in Chrome 4 on my 2yo Core duo 2 @ 2.0 Ghz laptop with a rusty integrated Intel GMA 950 - isokadded on the 2009-10-26 08:48:40
- 512b JavaScript JSpongy by Ribbon [web]
- Thanks everyone! Especially Mentor :)
Well, even though it may not be obvious to eveyrone, along the size optimizations, there are a couple of speed optimizations in JSpongy and these did not come out of the blue. The whole thing took some efforts and thinking to figure out ways to get a reasonable speed and retain a small footprint and large-ish feature set ( rotation around multiple axis, overall styling, cross browser compatibility, numerical precision, ... ).
About the size itself, you have to remember that JavaScript is a scripting language. The form sent to and used by the user agents is the source code. Not native compiled code like x86 opcodes. So iin terms of size alone, JSpongy and Spongy are like apples and pears: uncompiled (super) high level code vs compiled low level code.
The "release" version of JSpongy is wasting many bytes in CSS and overall styling, The raymarching algorithm itself isn't that complex. The smallest size I reached so far for the intro was around 310 bytes by scarifying a lot on the styling and camera target. Had someone managed to cram a similar raymarcher in 256 bytes of JavaScript, or less, I would definitely give my hat off.
- isokadded on the 2009-10-24 04:04:33
- 512b JavaScript JSpongy by Ribbon [web]
- Works best in Chrome 3+ & Firefox 3.5+
Respect to Mentor. - isokadded on the 2009-10-23 19:34:15
account created on the 2000-07-30 00:31:20
