Go to bottom


category: general [glöplog]
hollowman: true true.

Anyway.... luckily not my battle.
added on the 2005-01-02 12:43:47 by irvin irvin
at least Stefan got what i wanted.. he might get hurt eventually, if he has a rendez-vous with Nuke... (hint: perhaps breakpoint) :P
megadelux, if you are trying to do something else than mock people who have been hurt by the tsunami, you are failing so bad that you need to get your ass kicked. so,



added on the 2005-01-02 14:42:56 by nosfe nosfe
megadelux: if your first post was intended to convey some kind of message about the greediness of the red cross, you did not get the message across AT ALL. it is IMPOSSIBLE to extract this message out of the bullshit you wrote. so the failure is YOUR FAULT, not the readers' fault.
added on the 2005-01-02 14:52:36 by jazzman jazzman
people, what do you expect from someone who speaks the same "language" as a muppet who uses tennis raquets for cooking? :)
considering the savage reactions i guess the mud pit at BP will be finally put to good use :)
added on the 2005-01-02 15:23:54 by Gargaj Gargaj
place ya bets, place ya bets now!!! first up we have stefan vs nosfe!! second up we have the battle between dubmood and plek!! the third match will be the great 'ryg without glasses and gargaj with glasses punch battle' fight that everyone is waiting for!!!! then it's time for 'scene girl knockout' where leia will take on fashion !! it's gonna be a huge event people!!!! place ya bets.. place ya bets now!
added on the 2005-01-02 15:58:52 by okkie okkie
5 dollars (probably looks fucked up):

Code: stefan nosfe nosfe nosfe dubmood plek plek leia retires, nosfe wins ryg gargaj gargaj leia (gargaj won't punch girls) leia leia fashion
added on the 2005-01-02 16:22:57 by shadez shadez
you forgot the "Okkie vs. Coma a.k.a. 'Who's the real Jack Osbourne'-brawl" ;)
added on the 2005-01-02 16:23:36 by Gargaj Gargaj
>And apart from Nuke I only see a handful of posts referring to violence. Should I now refuse to discuss anything with the entire population of Sweden since by your methods of deduction none of them even care to discuss in anything except their native tongue?

ok, lets have a brief summary

pacman: dont throw a pie in that losers face, someone throw a fist :-) that fat b*stard would just eat the pie anyway :-D
LordGraga: I pray that someone will beat you up.
nosfe: some people seem to need a punch in the face. i'll be glad to delvier that at breakpoint.
nuke: if i will ever met you on some party, your ticket for hospital is sure! i hate people like you...
irvin:You deserve a fucking kick in the face, lator.

Two people pasted links on #c-64 to the same photo of a hotel destroyed by the tsunami, on the very detailed photo you could see lots of junk floating in the water, but if you looked more closely you would see that it wasnt just pieces of the building, the water was filled with dead bodies. i thought it was quite sick that someone would take this photo and that other would spread the url. Some day later i opened swedens biggest morning paper and saw that they published that same photo over almost an entire page.
Meanwhile one of swedens evening papers, which by tradition is more sensational than the morning papers since they dont rely on subscriptions, have tasty headlines on their website(direct translation) "there are lots of amateur movies coming in showing how the disaster strikes and how terribly powerless people are. Expressen has gathered a selection of all the clips", "PHOTO SPECIAL: Disaster - crushing everything and everyone"
The magazines are filled almost entirely of material about the death and sorrow caused by the tsunami, for all vultures to feast on. And all this mixed up with ads telling us where we can donate the money.

I'm not very surprised that lator, despite that he knows several people who were visiting thailand at that moment, chooses to just say FUCK YOU to it all.
added on the 2005-01-02 16:30:36 by hollowman hollowman
awesome shadez :) this bet stands!

and eh gargaj, i think coma would kick my ass (cause he's quite a bit bigger than i am :))
added on the 2005-01-02 16:41:55 by okkie okkie
hollowman, so what, stefan still deserves to get beaten up for 10000 more reasons than that.
added on the 2005-01-02 16:45:30 by dipswitch dipswitch
hollowman: spot the difference -> "fuck the victims" - "fuck the media"
added on the 2005-01-02 16:46:16 by Gargaj Gargaj
some attitudes in this thread scare me.
perhaps he should practice how to make his point clearly understood..
added on the 2005-01-02 16:48:06 by madMixx madMixx
Even if Stefan may have been expressing honest frustration, his history on Pouet gives me good reason to seriously doubt it until I hear a retort from the man himself.

I'm quite certain no one here, regardless of whether they have supported Red Cross or not, is particularly pleased with the predatory ways of certain less honourable representatives of the media. I'd be happy if they received no advertising revenues (and even happier if people stopped buying their magazines altogether); it's a shame that even Red Cross has to to play with the big boys to get anyone to even raise an eyebrow.
added on the 2005-01-02 16:58:27 by jobe jobe
peace love and care!


smoke weed!
"Even if Stefan may have been expressing honest frustration, his history on Pouet gives me good reason to seriously doubt it until I hear a retort from the man himself."

So... If someone disses (rather bad) demoproductions he is automatically an evil man who wants to see babies smashed dead in the streets.

Lots of you seems to not know the difference between random bashing about demosceneproductions and "socialanger". Iam not that very surprised about it tho.

Btw, in this thread i seriously wonder who is the fucking troll.
added on the 2005-01-02 17:41:23 by Hatikvah Hatikvah
I want to sing a beautiful song about the wonder that is skrebbel during the fights.
added on the 2005-01-02 17:44:14 by irvin irvin
I'm not talking about dissing demoproductions and you know that. Rather than providing an actual retort, you choose to misinterpret me on purpose to derail the discussion. QED.
added on the 2005-01-02 17:44:25 by jobe jobe
Fortunately it's a boring Sunday evening and I have enough time to waste to actually back up my words.


BB Image

Isolated examples? Perhaps, but enough to show it wouldn't be the first time for you to seek to mainly offend.
added on the 2005-01-02 18:04:46 by jobe jobe
jobe: exactly what doesnt that have to do with dissing demosceneprods?
added on the 2005-01-02 18:07:12 by Hatikvah Hatikvah
Besides, you still haven't explained what exactly in your initial post so "obviously" points at anything but provocation. Either you are trolling or you have exceptionally poor argumentation skills.
added on the 2005-01-02 18:13:29 by jobe jobe
what i kind of agree with stefan that newspaper do love this kind of events. they sell more, but still this accident is most horrible thing happened over 50 years :(
added on the 2005-01-02 18:13:37 by uns3en_ uns3en_
9/11 was a great story yes, and was strictly poltical true, nothing with demoscene.. no... still fun! nothing like this in other words, this was a disaster created by forces we cannot control nor steer.

in my first post it wasnt so obvious no, as i said to nuke on irc: "I could understand if you had gone nutty after my first post, but my explanation was there long before you started to go nutty"... and yes, my explanation came seconds after my first post.

first post came after i had browsed some swedish newspapers, i felt sick and disgusted, therefor i also took some precisious time and made screenshoots of it so you could see what i meant. as a finn you should know swedish well enough to understand whats writtern there in. to nuke i explained it all in english, made him mad as hell and wanted to kill me because he probably realized he had threatened someone without any real cause.
added on the 2005-01-02 18:28:55 by Hatikvah Hatikvah


Go to top