Go to bottom

fix me beautifull

category: general [glöplog]
done but oh my god, http://ultralame.untergrund.net/paralympix.rar is missing. I've set the download link to the file at skene.org.
added on the 2006-08-18 12:41:32 by v4nl4me v4nl4me
could you please "merge" those two groups:
1989 and 4242 ? they're the same.

and i think there's a mistake in http://www.pouet.net/party.php?which=535&when=06 . "deep 90%" should be in "8bit-demo"

thank you guys.
added on the 2006-08-18 18:07:58 by degauss degauss
(that's danish)
added on the 2006-08-18 22:15:04 by sparcus sparcus

Group should not be: Abnormal (ID: 1489)

It should be: Scarab (ID: 1498)
added on the 2006-08-18 23:34:15 by novel novel
but it is scarab ...
non-scene prod, delete pls.
added on the 2006-08-19 03:23:03 by dipswitch dipswitch
is tired, i'm late.. please delete bbcode efforts :(
added on the 2006-08-19 08:57:35 by Gaia Gaia
maybe it's time for me to ask ps for an account to fix such mistakes. but I don't think he'll give one to me.
Thank you, MadenMann!
added on the 2006-08-19 12:05:01 by novel novel
it wasn't me ... ;)
added on the 2006-08-20 15:44:45 by dipswitch dipswitch
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=25946 has a video here http://www.harderweb.de/jix/gp2x/whirlpool.mov
added on the 2006-08-20 21:45:15 by jix jix
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=25941 is a duplicate of http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=25943 and possibly the same prod as http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=25942
added on the 2006-08-20 21:51:33 by T$ T$
ts: yeah, I've noticed it but I couldn't find something that could give some clues. :/
I have a question... can a single person be a group? if not http://pouet.net/groups.php?which=6492 i'm a single person not a group...
added on the 2006-08-21 03:08:14 by jix jix
Yes, that's ok. I guess it wasn't planed at first, but since there are some people with a lot of one man releases ...
[url=http://pouet.net/groups.php?which=5867]T${/url] is a good example.
I should install the bbcode extension for Firefox again ...

this demo is mine.

it is really a 16k demo, but the compo didnt have a 16k category. i would really prefer it to be in the 16k category here, if that isnt against some rule.
added on the 2006-08-21 03:47:43 by sparr sparr
Since it's been released in a combined demo compo, it aint against whatever rule to set it to 16k. done!
added on the 2006-08-21 04:37:23 by iks iks
And i think that would not be a rule to set it to 16k if the compo was called 64k anyway.. maybe i'm wrong?
added on the 2006-08-21 04:38:12 by iks iks
the compo had no size limit, but there was an extra prize that demos under 64k were elligible for. that mine happened to fit under 64k was a coincidence. it seems unfair for such a demo to be stuck in a 64k category here, then i get comments like "i expect more in 64k". thanks for changing it.
added on the 2006-08-21 05:27:44 by sparr sparr


Go to top