pouët.net

*** 2000 ***

cheating bastard :P

http://www.pouet.net/groups.php?which=4239

POV disks should be named "POV ***" (this is how the authors write it)
not "POV#***" (this is how Brume/Pacidemo writes it)
and most certainly not "POV#***(blablablablablabla)" + musicdisk + demo + demopack categories (this is how very confused people write it i assume)

just to make clear:
POV#001 --> POV 1
:)

and their website is: http://homepages.tesco.net/~mark.davies/

2005 <o/

cheating bas... oh wait, i'll shut up :)

havoc: the idea was to avoid pseudo dupes, 2 pouet prod ids linking to same .zip one saying ghostbusters demo and the other saying pov 3. so i just added the name between brackets when its just 1 prod..

ps, that computes, no doubt. pov 4 and 5 are damn confusing to say the least. (not to mention zuul 69...)

but afaik there are also "non demopack" versions of these demos- somewhere. in an ideal world, that's what i'd like to see listed as the ghostbusters demo, and in that case it'd be no problem to list pov 4 as pov 4 imho.

i guess i need to stfu until i dig up those "real" versions somehow...

yeh, well, i wont mind cashing in a few more glops for the sake of archive coherence. but for 1disk packs with just 1 demo from the same group who packed it, seems kinda bizare to bother. anyways, im working on a way to identify related prods, so that on prod.php of demopacks there will be a list to links of the prodids of the prods inside it... i'll fix things then.

added support for prod affiliations, only gloperators can add them using submitprodaffils.php (link on submit.php)

tested and working with some of the discloned relations http://www.pouet.net/search.php?what=disclone

\o/ finally \o/
Thx ps, this evening will be an interesting one for me. :)

maden: try not to double click too much :P hate having to delete dupes :P

2012 rocks

error in title :
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=16008
see NFO, right title is : "Aperitif"
(wich means in french : drinking with friends before the lunch)

correct screenshot for Question mark is available here

zone: hehe, nice nice ( i didnt know that, and that's not the title, but what the heck ) :D

prod: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=10598
working download: http://www.scene.org/file.php?file=/parties/2003/buenzli03/info/buenzli12_invitation.zip&fileinfo
video download: http://www.vantage.ch/files/buenzli12_mpg4_xvid.mpg

damn, the correct video download link is http://www.buenz.li/files/buenzli12_mpg4_xvid.mpg. domain mixup :)

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=16054
My mistake: the real coding group is EDC.

http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=16083
3 state is no author of this prod.. i sure.

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=16040 is 32k, not 4. Please remove the partycompo info, since I'm not sure about this. CSDB says 4k which is probably wrong, unless they cheated.

http://www.pouet.net/groups.php?which=2852

besides the dupes, is this a group called "co-operation" or are there several different coops? anyhow, it looks a bit messy.

havoc: according to plus4.emucamp.com the crackers' demo series were made by a bunch of diferent groups, hungarian crackers aparently. dunno about the other prods, but i reckon luca is using it to dump prods with more then 3 groups.. i'll check them one by one later when i got some motivation and see which ones are divisable into 3 groups and which ones will go groupless.

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7822 is an invitation, not an intro.. please change the type (should have been done long ago already).. thank you in advance.

regards,