pouët.net

Go to bottom

fix me beautifull

category: general [glöplog]
romain: please read the red box.
added on the 2019-05-01 09:29:53 by havoc havoc
@tomaes: All other related prods were set as "remix of" in this case (I think havoc did it?). I think that's fine. What would make this one different?
Quote:
All other related prods were set as "remix of" in this case (I think havoc did it?). I think that's fine. What would make this one different?

I figure most are varying mixes of both. A bit of a port (different platform aspect) and a bit of a remix (altered content aspect); Since there are not clear lines and we can't have both, I set it to remix as well.
added on the 2019-05-01 16:05:18 by tomaes tomaes
There is a problem with this prod: ...

The capitalization on the name of the prod is wrong and the screenshot is messed up. I think that was how the demo was shown unfortunatly. Something went wrong from the prod being tested on the compo machineand looking correct there to the actual showing of it later that day. It was made for a 24bpp terminal, but somehow got run on a non-24bpp terminal.
added on the 2019-05-01 19:28:21 by Zokum Zokum
There is a problem with this prod: ...

Here's a correct screenshot: https://zokum.net/filler-2019.png

The capitalization is fine, just a bit odd on the edit page, but that is aparently a pouet thing :)
added on the 2019-05-01 19:37:23 by Zokum Zokum
The screenshot needs to be in 400x300 max though.
added on the 2019-05-01 20:00:42 by tomaes tomaes
There is a problem with this prod: ...Download is broken.
Devilmarkus: Then better search + submit a working link.
done
added on the 2019-05-05 00:15:22 by havoc havoc
There is a problem with this prod: the video link is broken
added on the 2019-05-05 20:38:15 by cslag cslag
There is a problem with this prod: ...
The type is no "16K" but a "Demo".
added on the 2019-05-06 22:34:09 by mr_spiv mr_spiv
cslag: we won't search for it so no need to report something like that unless you have a working link (and in this case ---> please read the red box below)

mr_spiv: i saw you were the coder but the file is still 16k. other gloperators might think different though but i leave it as it is.
(and even the nfo says "intro")
I always felt those xK intro modifiers are a bit relative to the machine in question. "64k" for C64? Well, duh, that's a mighty big program, but on a PC with many gigs of RAM, sure, that distinction makes sense. A "4k intro" on a machine with 5k RAM (VC-20 f.e.) won't make much sense either, might as well go with demo (or just "intro"); don't know about the case above. I'd label it plain "intro" I guess, but that's just my 2 cents.
added on the 2019-05-07 17:22:11 by tomaes tomaes
Please update the the screenshot of Sumea to this.
added on the 2019-05-08 13:30:54 by noby noby
done
added on the 2019-05-08 13:51:41 by havoc havoc
Hi,
There is a problem with this prod: .
How to change my comment, I left the pig by default when publishing and I want to change it to 'ok', is it possible?
added on the 2019-05-08 14:19:44 by Frogg Frogg
Frogg, just leave one more comment with a thumb.
added on the 2019-05-08 14:33:55 by 100bit 100bit
Done. (the main link was already fixed through the request system)
added on the 2019-05-09 07:53:44 by tomaes tomaes
Misclick... this should be in the "beginner demo compo".
added on the 2019-05-09 22:18:15 by noby noby
done
added on the 2019-05-09 22:23:12 by havoc havoc
There is a problem with this prod: Due to tiredness I added a shitty screenshot, here is a better one. The aspect is off but at least it doesn't look like screen vomit.
added on the 2019-05-10 11:09:56 by El Topo El Topo
el topo: there's a bigger problem with that prod i'd say- it seems to have nothing to do with demoscene whatsoever. so i'm inclined to delete it. unless you can explain why you added it using arguments other than those you already mentioned in the prod's comment section?
added on the 2019-05-10 11:32:33 by havoc havoc

login

Go to top