Impulse Tracker source code release
category: general [glöplog]
My response is that the WTFPL is not a good license.
trc: you can also re-license it claiming that whoever reads it has to commit suicide, it wouldn't make it accountable by law. you can only re-license something that is accepted legally or that re-licensing is void. in this case wtf you want needs to be within the law. and it's not legal to claim sole copyright of something when there is proof of precendence.
Some people have some weird ideas…
Some people have some weird replies to these weird ideas.
Some people should just realize why IT > XM, it's never too late.
Some people have some weird replies to these weird ideas.
Some people should just realize why IT > XM, it's never too late.
Quote:
IT > XM
+1 :D
Quote:
you can also re-license it claiming that whoever reads it has to commit suicide
Holy shit that's genius.
Quote:
Some people should just realize why IT > XM, it's never too late.
Never gets old.
FT2 interface forever.
If WTFPL seems too childish or vulgar, unlicense is always a good option.
While FT2 had nifty sample editor and stuff like that, ST3/IT interface was more preferable due to its more keyboard oriented style.
FT2 + GUS forever
Gargaj's opinion is better.
ok, I'll switch to Lotus123.
IT forever.
WTFPL is of course the best licence ever :D
I'm actually astonished nobody thought of creating DOGEPL
Code:
so code wow
much freedoms
no restrictions
as-is
Awesome to see this released!
What do you guys think of Renoise?
:|
Any word on those drivers? The overview says "including sound drivers", but I can't see them in the repository.
Your nick seems to describe the situation realistically.
Quote:
What do you guys think of Renoise?
absence: Soon. (TM) Probably the same time he sets the license.
Man, there are *so many* naughty things I want to do to this program... but I barely know a single line of ASM and have no idea where to start. Oh well.
BTW IT >> XM - but I'm talking about the *format*. I like Fastrracker itself just fine but the way XM forces samples into instrument containers and the way things like default pans are handled is beyond infuriating...
That said if I'm working in XM I'd rather use Digitrakker. But then IT ~<> MDL >> XM.
If I ever manage to code something release-worthy I am totally using the DOGEPL.
BTW IT >> XM - but I'm talking about the *format*. I like Fastrracker itself just fine but the way XM forces samples into instrument containers and the way things like default pans are handled is beyond infuriating...
That said if I'm working in XM I'd rather use Digitrakker. But then IT ~<> MDL >> XM.
If I ever manage to code something release-worthy I am totally using the DOGEPL.