pouët.net

@sensen: light? you're weird!

I thought it was funny. A little bit 4chan... but funny no less.

It was light because it takes time to see it's NFSWness. It's not visible in a blink of an eye (less time than required to press Alt+TAB or Page Down till you realize it's not safe). But the theme was NSFW.

I do wonder why they emphasised the fact that he was aboriginal tho. As far as I know the media here has to be careful not to be seen to be racially stereotyping.

Tbh I think bestiality isn't exactly 'light' nsfw but as Opti pointed out it's not that apparent until you actually have a good look at the pic.
What's more in sen's defence - he did the right thing by labeling it "nsfw" and linking to the pic rather than showing it - there's far more people here who haven't done so in the past than have.

Interestingly a lot of those posters that posted nsfw pics here rather than links were many of the same that accused me of being an objectifier of women in the real random women thread. Hmm...
A NSFW Pic of a real random woman btw. Enjoy!

well the "light (?)" because it is drawn without overdoing it and has - at least for me - some overall artistic value. and as optimus said it is not visible at the first glance. so: safety first :)

but now back to the bright sight of life :)

Take this on your journey, ronaldo! ;)