the terror of insomnia
category: general [glöplog]
1. And what do YOU know about religion at all, iblis? Note that reading (parts of the) Qur'an does NOT make you an expert.
2. "You obviously know little to nothing about relegion, if you judge it merely by its followers". It is his right to do so, as this is the way religion manifests itself in the real world. Moreover, have you even *remotely* considered your phrase? On what criteria would you make such decision? Don't bother yourself answering, as I would retort you to your own citation: "And that would be...your oppinion mate"
3. There is no such word "malecheuvinism" etc., so stop inventing such crap as you obviously fail not only to achieve the desired effect of well-educatedness, but also sound more or less ridiculous. Also, there is no reason to build an aura of preponderance around himself.
4. Why are you still so vehemently trying to defend your opinion (yes, it is, after all, your very own personal POV), even if - you yourself said it - the subject was already settled for you? You weren't even directly adressed, so your "its altso an islamic thing to answer when directly asked" rule won't apply here.
2. "You obviously know little to nothing about relegion, if you judge it merely by its followers". It is his right to do so, as this is the way religion manifests itself in the real world. Moreover, have you even *remotely* considered your phrase? On what criteria would you make such decision? Don't bother yourself answering, as I would retort you to your own citation: "And that would be...your oppinion mate"
3. There is no such word "malecheuvinism" etc., so stop inventing such crap as you obviously fail not only to achieve the desired effect of well-educatedness, but also sound more or less ridiculous. Also, there is no reason to build an aura of preponderance around himself.
4. Why are you still so vehemently trying to defend your opinion (yes, it is, after all, your very own personal POV), even if - you yourself said it - the subject was already settled for you? You weren't even directly adressed, so your "its altso an islamic thing to answer when directly asked" rule won't apply here.
Quote:
1. And what do YOU know about religion at all, iblis? Note that reading (parts of the) Qur'an does NOT make you an expert.
Having studied Bible, Torah an Quran for well over 10 years doesnt make me an expert i admit. But it does however qualify me to speak on the subject in general, aswell as about the particular relegions i know about.
Quote:
You obviously know little to nothing about relegion, if you judge it merely by its followers". It is his right to do so, as this is the way religion manifests itself in the real world. Moreover, have you even *remotely* considered your phrase? On what criteria would you make such decision? Don't bother yourself answering, as I would retort you to your own citation: "And that would be...your oppinion mate"
Dont direkt questions at me and answer them yourself, that is plain rude. Any ideology should be judged on it scriptures. People makes mistakes.
Quote:
There is no such word "malecheuvinism" etc., so stop inventing such crap as you obviously fail not only to achieve the desired effect of well-educatedness, but also sound more or less ridiculous. Also, there is no reason to build an aura of preponderance around himself.
You are right, i misspelled it. The correct spelling is this: "male chauvinism" and according to www.dictionar.com it means.
"male chauvinist
n.
A man whose behavior and attitude toward women indicate a belief that they are innately inferior to men."
Quote:
Why are you still so vehemently trying to defend your opinion (yes, it is, after all, your very own personal POV), even if - you yourself said it - the subject was already settled for you? You weren't even directly adressed, so your "its altso an islamic thing to answer when directly asked" rule won't apply here.
When someone write @iblis, i concider my self directly addressed, being that Iblis is the handle i used to make an account on pouet.net with.
I dont know what point you a trying to convey here, but somehow you just managed to make youself stand out as a fool. Nomatter what you belive in.
Iblis, speaking "on subject[s] in general" terms seems to be your problem indeed. Instead of clearly referring to my arguments you only give either answers that are either your own opinion ("Any ideology should be judged on it scriptures"), ones to which the point of argument has been (intendedly) biased by you toward an answer which suits you better ("You are right, i misspelled it") or that are simply and plainly wrong ("When someone write @iblis, i concider my self directly addressed"...please pinpoint the exact location of "iblis" in mot's first post).
Cheers.
Cheers.
Mot's post:
Who in this thread other than me have threatened anyone else with physical retaliation if i didnt get a appology, but me?
So in fact this was, like it or not, indirectly aimed at me. It is indeed pretty normal to react upon "spoken about" aswell as spoken at.That i used "Islamic" was not for you to twist about what i said.
Mate are you high? Take a look at this.
What other answer could you ask for? You specificly ask me what I know of relegions, and i merely answer the question. And give reason as to why, i feel entitled to speak about these matters as i do. The only thing thats wrong with my answers, is that you dont like them.
You said no such word excisted. i proved you wrong, and admittet to the fact that i mispelled the word because i do not care to much about spelling on BBS's. Like most other people.
Take a look at this : malecheuvinism vs. male chauvinism
please note that the only flaw is an e instaed of an a, and im missing a space. Could we agree that i really DID intend to use the words male chauvinism?
Right i stand corrected i failed to see that it was only about Mot, as you started to bend my words to suit your needs ""its altso an islamic thing to answer when directly asked" I could ask you the same thing. This was used in a conversation with dominei, so what it has to do with MoT's pst is not obvious.
You are free to continue this for as long as you like, but you are on very thin ice here.
Quote:
The thing is, it just saddens me to see my companions becoming violent over who believes in the best (man made) religion. And that was the reason for my post.
Who in this thread other than me have threatened anyone else with physical retaliation if i didnt get a appology, but me?
So in fact this was, like it or not, indirectly aimed at me. It is indeed pretty normal to react upon "spoken about" aswell as spoken at.That i used "Islamic" was not for you to twist about what i said.
Quote:
Iblis, speaking "on subject[s] in general" terms seems to be your problem indeed. Instead of clearly referring to my arguments you only give either answers that are either your own opinion ("Any ideology should be judged on it scriptures")
Mate are you high? Take a look at this.
Quote:
1. And what do YOU know about religion at all, iblis? Note that reading (parts of the) Qur'an does NOT make you an expert.
Having studied Bible, Torah an Quran for well over 10 years doesnt make me an expert i admit. But it does however qualify me to speak on the subject in general, aswell as about the particular relegions i know about.
What other answer could you ask for? You specificly ask me what I know of relegions, and i merely answer the question. And give reason as to why, i feel entitled to speak about these matters as i do. The only thing thats wrong with my answers, is that you dont like them.
Quote:
ones to which the point of argument has been (intendedly) biased by you toward an answer which suits you better ("You are right, i misspelled it")
You said no such word excisted. i proved you wrong, and admittet to the fact that i mispelled the word because i do not care to much about spelling on BBS's. Like most other people.
Take a look at this : malecheuvinism vs. male chauvinism
please note that the only flaw is an e instaed of an a, and im missing a space. Could we agree that i really DID intend to use the words male chauvinism?
Quote:
or that are simply and plainly wrong ("When someone write @iblis, i concider my self directly addressed"...please pinpoint the exact location of "iblis" in mot's first post).
Right i stand corrected i failed to see that it was only about Mot, as you started to bend my words to suit your needs ""its altso an islamic thing to answer when directly asked" I could ask you the same thing. This was used in a conversation with dominei, so what it has to do with MoT's pst is not obvious.
You are free to continue this for as long as you like, but you are on very thin ice here.
oh remove the S from relegion.
And not only that, here you imply that you have knowledge about my knowledge. From where did you get this? Have i stated somwhere that i only read parts of the QURAN as my base of knowledge on relegion?
Quote:
Note that reading (parts of the) Qur'an does NOT make you an expert.
religion is for pussies
(ohoh now that's offensive, two points for me)
(ohoh now that's offensive, two points for me)
whats offensive about that? thats just your slated and biased oppinion as is mine about having no relegion being for idiots who cannot fathom the concept.
an extra point for me for riiing you up ;)
actually I have no problem with people who have religion, I respect people's opinions in that respect. Religion is great for some people, whereas for other people, religion has no place in their life.
it's not (necessarily) that they're "idiots who can't fathom the concept", it's often simply a matter of religion just not taking any significant role in their life. It's the same as someone who DOES have religion, just the opposite extreme.
The only problem I do have with religion is when people (like, the 'moral majority' of america) who force their religion upon everyone else and in the end just cause more problems for everyone. That's where it all goes wrong, IMO. And that's not even religions fault necessarily, that's just the fact that a lot of people are fucking idiots.
actually I have no problem with people who have religion, I respect people's opinions in that respect. Religion is great for some people, whereas for other people, religion has no place in their life.
it's not (necessarily) that they're "idiots who can't fathom the concept", it's often simply a matter of religion just not taking any significant role in their life. It's the same as someone who DOES have religion, just the opposite extreme.
The only problem I do have with religion is when people (like, the 'moral majority' of america) who force their religion upon everyone else and in the end just cause more problems for everyone. That's where it all goes wrong, IMO. And that's not even religions fault necessarily, that's just the fact that a lot of people are fucking idiots.
well said.
Whiteshade, you put it on the edge, i put it on the edge :-D
But i applauds you last post. I could simply not agree more. I say somewhat the same about a lot of muslims, and then they want to fight me because i think Osama bin laden and people like him are fruitcakes that should be shot for the best of everybody.
Most relegious people suffer form a spiritual solar eclipse.
But i applauds you last post. I could simply not agree more. I say somewhat the same about a lot of muslims, and then they want to fight me because i think Osama bin laden and people like him are fruitcakes that should be shot for the best of everybody.
Most relegious people suffer form a spiritual solar eclipse.
amen! and that's the end of that!
<thread closed>
<thread closed>
