pouët.net

Find more of this young lady here.

[img]http://img2.etsystatic.com/000/0/6455912/il_fullxfull.338917229.jpg[/im
g]

[img]http://m4.i.pbase.com/o6/98/946498/1/149728754.6AEkMzUF.IMG_5179ModifierModifier.jpg
[/img]

yo ringo. eat some.

it's kinda weird to say, but... yeah... i check this thread here for some random visual thing you throw in here and i can merge that random with some version of a generic and nice looking natural woman graphics. but...

could you atleast make sure not to blow up cheap bandwidths here. i'm not caching that alot. so... perhaps... post one photo at a time? ;)

Roger that, will do. :]

yumeji: or 4 smaller ones :D

now you're mocking me. ... atleast you try. doesn't work tho. :P

actually i know what you mean. when opening this thread my machine is really busy loading all that data and surfing is not really smooth anymore until everything is loaded :D

^ I have the same issue with the random gif thread, sen.
But point taken yumeji, maybe 1 or 2 pics, and as you may notice I don't post everyday.
I have asked in the past if everyone wanted my pics smaller and most respondents said they were happy with the size. I can do some optimizing.

I'm guessing (from the other image threads) that post count is what triggers a new page - if that's so maybe I can see if Garg can lower the post count on this page (seeing as it's not a 'busy' thread and that way there'll be less images per page in general here so faster loading times.

Just a thought.

Use the right browser. I have chrome 28.0 (mac osx), no issues with this thread. Firefox cause me a lot of memory issues some months ago.

Chromium (debian 6.1) always loads and renders faster than ff but even if I do the --single-process switch it's still a bigger mem/cpu hog than swiftfox (the ff flavor that I use.). To the point that if I'm using it I regularly have to shut it down otherwise it starts to eat up swap.

Thanks for the suggestion tho ;)

Easier on the bandwidth?