Need help to test new synthesizer
category: code [glöplog]
ok then. I'm not going to join the age-old coder vs. artist (or gear slutz) debate here.
You're a musician, I'm primarily a coder who just happens to make a track every now and then (rather for testing purposes, that is).
To get to the point, Arguru's idea of having a tracker with 'infinite' step resolution (one of his late inventions) is quite nice, IMHO.
I share that thought (and re-invented it independent of his efforts) -- but that's only me as a 'technician' talking.
I'm going to call it a day now. Be well.
You're a musician, I'm primarily a coder who just happens to make a track every now and then (rather for testing purposes, that is).
To get to the point, Arguru's idea of having a tracker with 'infinite' step resolution (one of his late inventions) is quite nice, IMHO.
I share that thought (and re-invented it independent of his efforts) -- but that's only me as a 'technician' talking.
I'm going to call it a day now. Be well.
I'm touchy about French baguette-eating Bypass members who think things are touchy!
@xyz: Thanks for the feedback, Bacter definitely did a nice job there, but it truly only scratches the surface of what this synth is capable of.
Sounds excellent on the demo songs
So where is a single VSTI dll I can download for testing purposes?)
xyz: I don't care about tools, tools are tools, and yes, Arguru was a great coder, he had great ideas and he surely influenced a lot of other audio coders. That is rather "known" over the internet, there were no need to remind it.
And I don't think we don't need technicians, at all.
plek: french... baguette-eating? Isn't it... a pleonasm?
And I don't think we don't need technicians, at all.
plek: french... baguette-eating? Isn't it... a pleonasm?
Jcl: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=59335
Checkout the requirements in the nfo.
Checkout the requirements in the nfo.
TLM: yes, that's where I downloaded it from (?)
Ah, sorry got confused with el-bee.
brainless me, keeps getting confusing for that before/after naming :(
brainless me, keeps getting confusing for that before/after naming :(
Quote:
And I don't think we don't need technicians, at all.
well, it's a free country and everybody's entitled to his own stupid opinions.
(still luv ya, knl <3)
now on topic:
JohnD: I've checked out your sources but I still wonder what kind of license you have in mind ? LPGL ? GPL ? BSD ?
xyz: Interesting, I didn't give it a thought.
What's the downside with saying "that's the source, you guys knock yourself out with it, do whatever you want with it and it will be nice if you mention my name if you do"?
What's the downside with saying "that's the source, you guys knock yourself out with it, do whatever you want with it and it will be nice if you mention my name if you do"?
Well, that's pretty close to the simplified BSD license anyway. ;)
xyz: did you really what I said ;) I said that I didn't think (and didn't say) we didn't need technicians. Hence, we need them, technicians, of course. I mean, why would I be a member of the demoscene™ if I were thinking we didn't need them!!!
YSOSERIOUS.
YSOSERIOUS.
Isn't saying "I don't care" == saying nothing?
There are like, 3 discussions in one... perfect pouet thread ;)
Not saying anything isn't granting any rights.
going along with knl comment:
"demoscene™" - we should make it official ;)
"demoscene™" - we should make it official ;)
http://www.ohloh.net/licenses/bsd_2clause_ish
So I end up with:
Now, considering the fact that I rather hide behind my nick (I'm not sure how legal is TinyFM8) and that I have no plans to expose my identity, why should I protect myself from "damages" caused by this software?
Quote:
Include? exclude? How cares? Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
Quote:
I guess I don't care about that as well.2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
So I end up with:
Quote:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE
Now, considering the fact that I rather hide behind my nick (I'm not sure how legal is TinyFM8) and that I have no plans to expose my identity, why should I protect myself from "damages" caused by this software?
It's dangerous to license alone ! Take this
http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
Quote:
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, December 2004
Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net>
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified
copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long
as the name is changed.
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
geee, I LIKE IT!
That's not a license. Check the Revision 2012 seminar about licensing.
