pouët.net

Go to bottom

fix me beautifull

category: general [glöplog]
previous page
next page
go to page of 1197
Done.
added on the 2012-05-12 15:02:43 by tomaes tomaes
Dunno, if it's worth getting into an argument about it, but imho it's not automatically a group co-prod just because one member of a second group makes an appearance. Some atari dude who knows those prods should do this one. I did add the youtube links though.
added on the 2012-05-12 19:19:40 by tomaes tomaes
Thanx for the links.

Ok ! let me do argument all prods :

* Add Sector One (id=228)
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=59235
=> http://www.popsyteam.org/vip2012/ : you can see the results from the organisers.
Ok, I admit that all productions included inside this compilation come from Sector One, scrolltext did by a member of Sector One, presented at the VIP by a member of Sector One, bla bla....

* Add NoExtra (id=7044)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53483
=> http://www.gnagnaki.net/another-kid-story : music from TomChi / NoExtra
(no appearance here !)

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=16425
=> I code this, see the credits in the scrolltext.

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=29703
=> See the scrolltext or the logo at the beginning.

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=30161
=> You don't see the logo on the picture ? Maybe the picture was to dark to see the name of the crew...

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=30743
=> See the scrolltext or the logo at the beginning too !

* Add MjjProd (id=232)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=28958
=> I coded this, see the scrolltexts for the credits.

Can you check all prods on an emulator to see what I say please !
added on the 2012-05-12 21:56:19 by Zorro 2 Zorro 2
I'm not too fond of adding groups everywhere like that when the productions are specifically released under one group name. Or else we will end up adding 20 groupnames to tons of groups, for example if some of the participants belong/belonged to other groups.
added on the 2012-05-12 22:04:36 by keops keops
also, the nfo files of #28958 and #59235 only mention one group.
added on the 2012-05-12 22:08:13 by keops keops
youtube for this prod
added on the 2012-05-13 00:16:01 by Buckethead Buckethead
done
added on the 2012-05-13 00:24:12 by havoc havoc
Hi Keops and Tomaes,

About prod #59235, I admit it's my fault when I made this file. But SPS, JEDI, ANTICHRIST and HELLO came from Sector One crew if I read the nfo file.
All productions inlcude inside this menu come from of Sector One.

I agree with you to not add a tons of crew on a production submitted. But I have an unpleasant surprise to see Mikael posted his production (http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=59232) outside the original production (http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=58562) where it comes.
I confess you that I don't want to see the same thing with this production ((http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=59235).
Otherwise, is it good to continue to make rare compilations ?

About menus of TCE/BSW, we made them but we didn't post them in pouet... it's not really our faults if some people omited to add our team when they published these productions. However, our logos and the credits will remain under these productions.

About prod #53483, the nfo file indicates "music by TomChi of NoExtra", I don't understand...

Why today to correct some stuffs on pouet ? There are a long time when I want decide to do this. Now I counted 6 productions/co-productions outside our team, in my opinion it's been too...

Thanks for your replies.

Cheers.
added on the 2012-05-13 16:11:55 by Zorro 2 Zorro 2
video for this prod
added on the 2012-05-13 17:48:32 by comankh comankh
Also, this two prods are from http://pouet.net/groups.php?which=11663 :)
added on the 2012-05-13 18:32:56 by quasimodo quasimodo
done

zorro2:
59235: it's added as a compilation, under the group that made the compilation. if someone wants to add the individual screens separately, then they should be added under the group that made the individual screens. everything 100% OK as it is now- in my view

what mikael did is exactly according to pouet.net standards, nothing is wrong with that, and it does not take anything away from the people who made the compilation- in my view

tce/bsw compils are tce/bsw compils, if you insist to add the menu intros separately under the banner that is responsible for them, that's aboslutely OK- in my view

53483, in the nfo it says MJJ PROD, not anything else, so the prod was added correctly- in my view

it seems to me that you have a different idea about how stuff should be added to pouet. ofcourse you are entitled to your opinion, but the people who run this site don't agree. you are ofcourse free to make your own site to document things according to your own views, there is no need to reiterate your points again and again.
added on the 2012-05-13 18:39:50 by havoc havoc
zorro2: I guess this is yet another case of "please wait for pouet v2's credit system." The current db layout is not well suited for what you are asking for and the status quo is pretty inconsistent (sceners added as groups etc.) as it is. :)
added on the 2012-05-13 19:26:13 by tomaes tomaes
done
added on the 2012-05-13 20:39:20 by Tomoya Tomoya
I believe this fine demo is actually called Double Maniac. At least that's what the scroller says. Also youtube
added on the 2012-05-14 18:37:03 by cruzer cruzer
Done.
added on the 2012-05-14 20:53:00 by tomaes tomaes
@Tomaes : I saw that some people/admins from pouet change all the times some "modifications" on productions :
- http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=28956 : 3 days with our id and today not
- http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=59235 : it remained 2 days with our id and tody not
Who manages what on pouet ? If a person did a thing, an another person passes behind him to remove it.
What is the only person/webmaster I must really see for do my requests on pouet ?

Cheers.
added on the 2012-05-14 20:56:36 by Zorro 2 Zorro 2
@tomaes: You forgot to change the title. I have proof that Double Maniac is the real name.
added on the 2012-05-14 21:20:06 by cruzer cruzer
done

zorro2: gargaj's the boss, you could ofcourse try your chances but given the fact that 3 longtime glöperators already told you "no", i don't know if it makes a lot of sense to contact him. in any case, i don't think it makes much sense to continue this discussion here.
added on the 2012-05-14 21:32:51 by havoc havoc
for tutorial2 by Ye Olde Laptops Posse, please add videos 1 and 2
added on the 2012-05-15 04:55:17 by provod provod
cruzer: I did not forget it. Someone changed it back? And apparently it has changed again in the mean time. %-)
added on the 2012-05-15 06:04:08 by tomaes tomaes
w23: Both videos are just individual scenes? And the second one isn't even in the prod? Please just make one video for the whole thing.
added on the 2012-05-15 06:07:23 by tomaes tomaes
previous page
next page
go to page of 1197

login

login via SceneID
log in :: register
Go to top