pouët.net

Go to bottom

JS1k, 1k Javascript demo contest

category: code [glöplog]
texel, inopia sort of did it :-) having the zoomblur, text writer and tunnel.
Inopias' 1k is almost an intro (cool stuff btw mate). If there were some bytes left to stream some MP3 or play an XM from the internets (though not allowed in JS1k, I know) ==> 1k JS intro!!!11!!1!
added on the 2010-08-12 13:24:25 by raer raer
My entry: http://js1k.com/demo/454
Slow anywhere, acceptable in Chrome.

I took some ideas (not code!) from Inopia and his double-<canvas> trick, and rez's kaleidoscope.

Basically there is 4 downsampled canvas, quite like a mipmap pyramid.
I blit these downsampled canvas for feedback and obligatory hypnoglow.
added on the 2010-08-18 11:24:24 by ponce ponce
added on the 2010-08-18 11:25:13 by ponce ponce
sorry but your kaleidoscope is ugly :(
#ponce, do a cube version for rasmus please, I think he's having an attack :)
rez's kaleidoscope is nice though.
Doesn't quite fit in 1k though.
added on the 2010-08-18 11:53:16 by ponce ponce
Quote:

sorry but your kaleidoscope is ugly :(

Webkit seems to account for sRGB when compositing while Firefox and Opera do not. So it looks better in Chrome/Safari.
added on the 2010-08-18 13:38:01 by ponce ponce
Rez's kaleidoscope can be done in 1k with most of its sexy though.
added on the 2010-08-18 13:58:26 by p01 p01
I tried it, but it's rez property and he already has an entry.
added on the 2010-08-18 14:10:13 by ponce ponce
@ponce: I like it!

@p01: I'm waiting for your new submission
added on the 2010-08-18 15:56:16 by texel texel
nice ones ...

http://js1k.com/demo/294

http://js1k.com/demo/378

http://js1k.com/demo/389

http://js1k.com/demo/411

goddamnit Ponce, now I'll have to go back and improve mine :)

Anyway, good stuff!
added on the 2010-08-18 23:02:23 by Inopia Inopia
Well, yours run great on all 4 browsers, which is quite a feat ^^

I think this one is the one to beat: http://js1k.com/demo/171

He also uses offscreen canvases and blogged about it.
added on the 2010-08-18 23:37:45 by ponce ponce
This is my shitty participation :)
added on the 2010-08-19 14:21:15 by Nicky One Nicky One
Nicky One, a big THUMB UP for IE compatibility! I like it!
added on the 2010-08-19 14:53:56 by texel texel
Hum, not tested on IE :)
added on the 2010-08-19 15:02:29 by Nicky One Nicky One
http://js1k.com/demo/171 only works when I move my mouse...
added on the 2010-08-19 15:16:07 by raer raer
inopia, yours works fine on my opera 10.61 + win7. and it *rocks*!
added on the 2010-08-19 20:43:28 by skrebbel skrebbel
@Inopia: I've just seen for the first time the radial blur in your entry. I advice you to show the radial blur faster, or there are a lot of possibilities of missing it - as I did.
added on the 2010-08-22 01:39:16 by texel texel
I disagree. Timing is great. Any sooner and the wow factor would have decreased. At least for me.
added on the 2010-08-22 02:28:41 by mrdoob mrdoob
Oh, I've just watched again the Inopia's entry. It looks that the timing depends on the computer and browser. In my computer and latest release of Opera, it takes 6/7 seconds to appear. In that case I completely agree with you trace, it looks perfect.

But, in Chrome, the browser I'm using to check the entries, it takes more than 20 seconds to switch to the radial blur... more than enough to get bored and press the "Next" button.

So, it looks that my problem is with animation by number of rendered frames instead of time based... and maybe it is not easy or possible to do, since time based requires 10-15 bytes more...
added on the 2010-08-22 05:44:38 by texel texel
added on the 2010-08-23 05:33:33 by texel texel

login

Go to top