pouët.net

Go to bottom

is there enough evidence that Richard Dawkins exists?

category: general [glöplog]
nice boobs.
added on the 2009-01-22 20:58:53 by skrebbel skrebbel
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 20:59:50 by nerve nerve
@skrebbel: That was Diana, the hunter goddess. Yes, very nice boobs.
added on the 2009-01-22 21:01:43 by ham ham
@nerve: Apollo! :D
added on the 2009-01-22 21:02:14 by ham ham
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 21:10:59 by nerve nerve
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 21:12:14 by nerve nerve
ham, actually i didn't really care who she was :-)
added on the 2009-01-22 21:27:34 by skrebbel skrebbel
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 21:32:50 by nerve nerve
@skrebbel: I know it. ;)

BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 21:36:48 by ham ham
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 21:41:56 by nerve nerve
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 21:50:15 by skan skan
Quote:
On the Origin of Specious


how: awesome!
added on the 2009-01-22 21:51:24 by nerve nerve
@skan: A good novel. I have it on my library.
added on the 2009-01-22 21:51:50 by ham ham
@Krabob: What about Jesus?
added on the 2009-01-22 21:53:44 by ham ham
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 22:01:05 by nerve nerve
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 22:02:44 by nerve nerve
Cthulhu!
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 22:03:18 by ham ham
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-22 22:09:35 by nerve nerve
you have things figured, neatly and all in order, I'm sure.

Anyway, it is a given that you idiots are going to allow these technocrats (Dawkins and his new brand of Priests) to deceptively equate your spirit with "God" and hypocritical religion, and trick you into throwing the entire lot out before we've had a chance to separate the two. Big mistake. but I'm going to somehow sadistically enjoy watching as much of the process as I possibly can during my life time-time. i have no pity for fools.

Kurt Gödel knew that science and logic is limited, logic is a failure for anything other than mechanical processes. And you silly little lemmings think it can answer the questions of your existence and should dictate your life? Why? Because Dawkins (and his shady athiest backers) told you so? Sorry, but it can't. Although it is a perfect vehicle for killing-off that pesky age old human trait called Spirit :P And I mean KILLING it, you thought "the Church" was bad when they controlled and misdirected it? At least remnants remained under the Church.

You're not robots, but that's exactly what we will become if you allow your most valuable human trait to be stolen. You should really _think_ and "reason" about THAT. Enjoy your new realm...drones!

The mantra should be "You probably wont exist"...

added on the 2009-01-22 22:46:22 by button button
Megazoom!: Your essay reminds me of this quote:

You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep-seated need to believe.

by Carl Sagan.

login

Go to top