pouët.net

dila: look I just found a thread to your liking on /b/: http://img.4chan.org/b/res/38935654.html (hint: Dont go there if you like cats, I am lucky they have thumbnails :( )

yeh, here's a good one.

bah, blocked.

haha!

and it will be gone soon..

Good.

True, I hate fucking cat killers!

kitties are good dancers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpA2tMrQ4RU

...and I dance dance dance, and I dance dance dance

tFt:It's too gay!


Just get that one and eat it!

Dila sheesh, that pic from the other thread, and to think myself and others over at 256b.com helped you get started coding and helped size-optimise your code and then you pull shit like this. Bad form dila, very dissapointing.

Yeah, dila abused all his size coding power to post burning kittens. Thats is something i would frown upon.

Agree, fuckings to Dila.

It was just a random image!


.....or was it?

a random number is never zero.

That's almost certainly true.

hmm... wrong thread.

Why not?

you never know.

El Topo: some kind of random number generators "lock" on zero, meaning that they a) never spit out zero and b) if they did, they would only spit out zeros afterwards
totally useless info, but hey, this is pouet

Then they are not very random.

Cats are evil
Cats are demons

Captain Zed Yago: That sounds like pretty crappy generators then. I know that you can get zero from a random function though if you use modulo to limit the randomness within a specific range. That does of course not mean that the number was zero to begin with.

My "fav" random number generator is at random.org that says it base its randomness on atmospheric noise. It seems possible to get zero there, but I don't know how they do the limiting.

if you request a random integer number between 0 and 1 inclusively, you will probably get a zero eventually.