fix me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
nfo seems to be fixed already.
Havoc: why admin? glöperators can do it too :P
Havoc: why admin? glöperators can do it too :P
I can't fix it myself... the .nfo explains how to run the mac version, it's not the normal way of bundle but to run via bash, that's why I'd like it to change, tnx.
can somebody change the download link from http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=17200
to:
http://www.ibw.nl/alien/hp1234.zip
muchos gracias
to:
http://www.ibw.nl/alien/hp1234.zip
muchos gracias
working download link for http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=15461 is: http://www.taat.fi/tmdc/demos/dbp_traction.zip
fixed
there are more TMDC entries with old planet-d.net links.. all entries can be found here: http://www.taat.fi/tmdc/demos/
Hey ! To my mind, the oneliner has a bug, when you press "more...", you can usually see between 0 and 20 lines there... but I had the case, when you
just see "The complete onliner..." and having no line displayed at all !
It should be impossible to have zero line !!! ( most of all , you press "more", and actually can have "less"...) What the fuck, javascript coders having problems with modulos ??? If you can only get the 20 last lines "rounded", here is a trick: get 2 pages and take the 20 last lines...
just see "The complete onliner..." and having no line displayed at all !
It should be impossible to have zero line !!! ( most of all , you press "more", and actually can have "less"...) What the fuck, javascript coders having problems with modulos ??? If you can only get the 20 last lines "rounded", here is a trick: get 2 pages and take the 20 last lines...
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=30056 assembly 1995 pc 4k INTRO disqualified plz correct i did mistake sorry
fixed.
prod.php, "comments are actually hidden" - the right word is currently, not actually
on the other hand you could also add "O RLY? YA RLY!" to make it make sense again :)
on the other hand you could also add "O RLY? YA RLY!" to make it make sense again :)
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=30080
not a demo
not a demo
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=7225
and again...
doesnt has something to do with the scene so it shouldnt be here.
beside of this... its allready covered by 500 000 gaming sitez
and again...
doesnt has something to do with the scene so it shouldnt be here.
beside of this... its allready covered by 500 000 gaming sitez
ohoh angry people here. just delete the stuff. think the 3dmark99max is exotic enough. most people can naever make it word on their machnes. also most of them were already posted, so why not complete it?
dont see any problem with listing the 3dmark thingies.. were made by sceners anyways, even if their purpose was primarily benchmarking not demoshowoff
add this group http://www.pouet.net/groups.php?which=1527
for this prod http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7791
as the nfofile says http://www.pouet.net/nfo.php?which=7791
for this prod http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7791
as the nfofile says http://www.pouet.net/nfo.php?which=7791
done
can I add the prods I linked long time ago on this page to pouet?
http://2k2.risky.de/downs/benchs.htm
or is it stupid like some people wrote here
vulpine was pleasure on amiga
realstorm is F.A.N.
don't know if the codecult were also sceners
http://2k2.risky.de/downs/benchs.htm
or is it stupid like some people wrote here
vulpine was pleasure on amiga
realstorm is F.A.N.
don't know if the codecult were also sceners
new downloads for prods, old links are dead:
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=6791 new download link http://www.futuremark.com/download/xl-r8r/
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=7225 new download link http://www.futuremark.com/download/3dmark2000/
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=11747 new download link http://www.futuremark.com/download/3dmark2001/
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=6791 new download link http://www.futuremark.com/download/xl-r8r/
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=7225 new download link http://www.futuremark.com/download/3dmark2000/
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=11747 new download link http://www.futuremark.com/download/3dmark2001/
seppjo: yes i guess. we need a benchmark icon.. anyone up for it?
Well I don't see any sense in upping benchmarks to pouet. They are definitely NOT scene productions (even if sceners are involved)... but this is just my personal point.
well, im not really that interested in having _all_ benchmarks inserted in the database, but the more memorable ones like the 3dmark ones i dont see any reason why not having them. they are often mentioned when discussing demos requirements and gfx performance issues anyways..
Still... benchmarks are not scene products... whats next? That or this gamedemo because a scener did some textures? ... hmm well it seems Im the evil guy this time but it makes absolutely no sense to me.
i understand your concearn. wouldnt want it to proliferate to demotools and games either.. but i reckon having the 3dmark exceptions wont cause that much fuss..