pouët.net

"Yeah, suck it blue! Now that's what I call an old school zinger. In your face blue dude, in your face!"

Computer God: Ok, you've given a payola to the test hoster! Or have done the test several times or have tested all the url params value with a script (if I remember well you've made a rip of a website using unix commands in the past) to find out the pic with the 100% results.

I suppose you've get this one so:

http://www.nerdtests.com/images/ft/cg.php?val=1100

However I scored 96%, there are 75 questions, so I "mistaken" at 3 questions: 75/100*96=72.

I did not answered VOIP, I did not answered 5 computers at home / work and I did not answered dual boot computer. What will happened if I do it?

100%: I'm also the ultimate god of THE STUPID USELESS COMPUTER TEST.

What I win now?
Nothing!
That's what I said, this test is stupid and can be cheated: use a script to generate all the php val http://www.nerdtests.com/images/ft/cg.php?val=!!!VAL!!!

Hint the one which lead to the no cheater pics begins all with a 3 and have 4 digits.

And no I haven't cheated, but I love hacking such stuff.

Ep: I did the test once with the intention of scoring high - what is so difficult to believe in that? Its easy to figure out most questions and some require some knowledge of the history of computing. But thats it.

I assume this isn't very good... :/

Ok CG: sorry you're the best (we have all cheated! :) ).

I want to interview you.

Please send me asap a msg at epcosmik@yahoo.co.uk

You're american if I had well understand.
So your point of view about the scene can be interesting.

Love and peace.

MadenMann: me too. Shit, what do we do now?!

Maybe you should just cheat with faked opposite answers ;)

oh i understand its that logic thing of
adok likes test , ep not like test : adok not ep
right?

Ep: Why on earth do you have a .uk email address and are barely able to write a single sentence free of mistakes?

You can contact me at nate.domi@gmail.com. But I won't give you the correct answers for the test, so dont bother to ask ;)

I start to understand back the Scener's logic and philosophy: FUN, FUN, FUN, rants, rants, rants, and that all that scene stuff is about being happier and happier.

So CG, no I'll not ask you for the correct answers: in fact I didn't displayed my real score. I get 150% and own the god of god of god title.

I'll contact you soon for the interview, thanks for the email and I hope we'll be more friend in the future.

I'm awaiting shane email too to interview him: the god of the trolls.

Don't blame him, Adok already told us why he is a bit stupid;

(Btw, this is even the reason for all the Bushisms from the emperor of Jesusland.)

The last quote should start with "Assuming that the average UK citizen has an IQ of 100,"

I shouldn't feed the trolls, but I want to emphasize that IQ has very little to do with learning languages (maybe excluding programming languages :). It depends more on linguistic skills and motivation. Also things like does one live in an enviroment where he can hear proper pronunciation of the foreign language affect (eg. are foreign TV shows dubbed or subtitled).

Wow, that means EP has either no linguistic skills or he doesn't live in the UK but somewhere in Vienna. Interesting.

YES!

I am unseen fate too, OMG ROTFLOLLERS!

Wasn't ep French, oder?

Other than that, I am really addicted to okcupid lately (That's probably why you don't see me writting regurarly on Pouet,. I just never get bored on the internet anymore ;).

Well yes,. most of the tests aren't to be taken very seriously, many of them are preety funny and the results surprising, other ones seem very precise in my case or they make me think twice, whether I ever thought of myself like this.

I tried several computer geek tests, usually I am the middle geek, but some of them ask about networks or Linux or things I am not into, the plain geek tests ask about Anime, books I have not read, movies I have not seen,. so the results are weird. One of them told me that I am hardly a geek, probably I own a girlfriend too =))). Hopefully this makes a better(?) impression of me to the girls taking the same test ;)))

Oh,. also I'd like you to try the graphics test, I did 51% in that and it told me I've probably never rendered anything to the screen :). But then again, I wasn't sure about several questions, even about some of the 3d questions.

My profile is here: http://www.okcupid.com/profile?tuid=9246773673683537126 (Look at the test I've taken, there are several funny stuff =)

ok ok I was bored, but :

Question : Normal calculations are good (on surfaces) for :

Backface culling , ambient lighting, point lighting, Z-buffer fighting ?


Hm ?

depends on the number of `normals per surface` calculated?

I was between backface culling and point lighting, the guy says it's the second.

backface face culling is not.

Point Lighting ? What the hell is this ?

Triumphant Nerd
80%

I supposed Point Lighting was per-pixel lighting.