|
Xenon by Outracks [web]
[nfo]
|
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 62% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: #48030 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
added on the 2002-10-13 21:46:53 by DiJ  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
sorry, ranked 1. :) nice demo btw!
rulez added on the 2002-10-13 21:48:13 by DiJ
ugly effects without relation to another, crappy techno and a hard cut off in the middle of the track at the end.
bad sound, bad gfx, no design, overall a bad release. thumb down
wtf
I forgot to mention. It's fucking slow with no apparent reason.
bad music, bad textures, no design.. we're waiting for your next prod guys. :)
hey you other people. this is actually their first demo. don't be too hard now :)
LETS TAKE IT DOOOWWWNN
This seems kinda slow considering what's displayed. It's sorta okay.
Well, it's kind of ugly and slow but considered it's your first prod then let say it was okay. The music I wasn't that bad actuallly. Landscape scene was really slow and 1.8Ghz + Geforce 3 Ti 500 should be able to generate that with better framerates. Work on your code and put a little more design to it, and don't let all them negative creepes above get to you!!
bad...
there are textures older than my granny :D
there are textures older than my granny :D
yeah, its their first release...
Hmz.... To _F_ing slow... else boring and annoying music.
hope you guys do it better next time. =)
hope you guys do it better next time. =)
FPH = Frames per Hour
Yeah bad framerate, but this could've been much, much worse! Especially as it's their 1st release! (For the fourth time...)
i saw the first scene and pressed escape. i suppose it's okay for a first demo, but definilty not worth the 1st price ;-D
really no use in watching this demo
macaw and knos summed it up quite nicely
Not bad for a first prod, but
a) it's _way_ too slow
b) it lacks any proper design
c) the music isn't particularily good and the sync is close to non-existant in parts.
So, overall, not a bad attempt, and I hope and believe the next one will be better :-)
a) it's _way_ too slow
b) it lacks any proper design
c) the music isn't particularily good and the sync is close to non-existant in parts.
So, overall, not a bad attempt, and I hope and believe the next one will be better :-)
boring and ugly.
Woo Hoo keep em commin.
nice 1 for 1st prod.
nice 1 for 1st prod.
i always envied groups with cool first demos - outracks owns me.
and there's prolly a good reason why the musician wasnt credited. :D
and there's prolly a good reason why the musician wasnt credited. :D
I'm to blame for the soundtrack, thats why the musician isnt credited :) The reason why this is so fucking slow is because everything was drawn with glBegin() and glVertex3f() and in addition to that i managed to have the draw() routine inside a for 0..10 loop. We don't know why.
cool first demo glBegin rules :)
Yeh, poor music, no design, abrupt end, zero interesting effects. But at least there are prods that are significantly worse.
Hehe, first Outracks demo. Kinda ugly, though kinda nice music. Piggie.
it's ok
imho very respectable for a first prod
imho very respectable for a first prod
Try again?
they've come a long way since this guy. :)
for a first prod i'd have to give a thumb up, but as it came 1st at norvegia, which is too much imho, i'll give it a piggy
Every legend has it's beginning ;-)
I still hate you for this.
Nice for a first prod. Way back in 2002 even. Didn't know you guys go back that far.
Seen TUFS demos far worse than this ;)
Seen TUFS demos far worse than this ;)
what???????
plus, idk who made that music but it's probably irvin.
oh wait, i think it's duckers
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !