Flash Starfield by Pandafox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
|
popularity : 59% |
|||||||
alltime top: #53222 |
|
|||||||
added on the 2008-06-18 11:52:09 by Pandafox |
popularity helper
comments
Ahahah! Sorry for this Flash starfield ;)
added on the 2008-06-18 11:52:37 by Pandafox
Got me to think about how I spent countless of hours looking at the starfield screensaver in Windows 98 when I was younger :)
It seems to be lacking perspective somehow.
What preacher said. Looks like my Amiga basic starfield.
woot 1k space effect !! and flash \o/
don't lie to us you're not sorry
1k ?!
The guys at actionscript.org looked at my 256b starfield in JS ( 209b without fog and title ) and apparantly got one in 244b ( without for or title ) but I've not tried to "compile" their result.
The guys at actionscript.org looked at my 256b starfield in JS ( 209b without fog and title ) and apparantly got one in 244b ( without for or title ) but I've not tried to "compile" their result.
Suffers from the same "bad starfield-coding" symptom that most demos in the early 90s had: bad relative speed between the different "layers of stars", no perspective and such. Not that impressive.
That's no starfield, more like a particle fountain. Or a jizzing clown.
what zoom said.
looks a bit like stuff with symmetry, well i don't like it that much, sorry ;)
pouha pouha pouha terrible ! lol
1k ?!
I wonder if flash should be even allowed in the 1K section... to every prod you can add 2K for the player ;)
shadebobs!
fuckings to mentor for stealing my joke :(
Starfield in 244 bytes [from p01's link]:
http://images.micksam7.com/flash/starfield-244.swf
Starfield in 287 bytes [mine based on code in p01's link]:
http://images.micksam7.com/flash/starfield-287.swf
http://images.micksam7.com/flash/starfield-244.swf
Starfield in 287 bytes [mine based on code in p01's link]:
http://images.micksam7.com/flash/starfield-287.swf
the 244b one is a bit sheiit but your looks neat.
The Qbasic version was better
"jizzing down" - lol
hm trop grande
hmmmm
please delete.
Yes, you are right, my first starfield was not so good... Sorry :)
Then, I changed it !
Is it better now ?
Then, I changed it !
Is it better now ?
more or less...
it's not starfield. it's a slideshow. and it's ugly as hell.
Dear stupid Unicorn :) It is not a slideshow, maybe you need glasses, or maybe a brain
Pandafox: sempron 1,83ghz - if i can count frames while watching it, it IS a slideshow for me. besides, effect is badly coded, actionscript is capable of much more than that.
and btw: this is a starfield. yours is a starfield wannabe.
and btw: this is a starfield. yours is a starfield wannabe.
Insulting other people is not a proper way for reputation.
not a good one at least. : \
I don't see what's wrong with it.
err pretty much everything?
Doesn't seem to be an anim but it's slow.
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !