|
starfield 512b by Sensenstahl [web]
[nfo]
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||
|
popularity : 58% |
|||||||
alltime top: #56343 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
added on the 2010-02-21 01:47:01 by sensenstahl  |
||||||||
popularity helper
comments
...is ok.
added on the 2010-02-21 01:58:10 by cryer 
bah
i believe we're way past this kind of stuff now, even in small intros
damn ugly
Quote:
key<>ESC will change things
to the better !!
seriously: this makes no sense in 2010 !
Points for the dos intro, but you should spend more time examining other intros in this category. There are a lot of complex intros in 128b and 256b. This effect is possible using much less space. Don't let that discourage you, keep up the coding!
Strange looking stars..
it's small, but it's ugly.
In 256 bytes, with proper name and changing thing automatically, would be really cool.
Quite OK I guess. Kinda pointless though.
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=2540
- half the size
- particles
- colorful
- realtime blur effect
- ten years ago
- half the size
- particles
- colorful
- realtime blur effect
- ten years ago
nah, i'm not booting my DOS machine for this. also, what Tigrou said.
craaap!
Looks like BITS.
fffff
FFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUU ??
Blew
=|
???
It's a cool motion within 512b.
suxx
Don't like it.
completely stupid
yeah now this shit gives me the creeps too. but well :D
Nice.
countering selfvote xD not bad for a firstie actually :)
awesome shaders
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !