| Oepir Risti 9 by Citron | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 47% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: #32223 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
added on the 2005-10-30 13:24:21 by ghandy  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
Sadly the last one !! I really miss it!
rulez added on the 2005-10-30 13:26:10 by ghandy
"if you think this is a filler, you missed the whole point of true magging" (puh in the "with love to russia" article)
well, if writing fillers is the true way of writing diskmags i don't want to have in common anything with diskmags at all. so this is the mag certain people keep idealizing so much while dreaming about "good old diskmag times". bah! seriously, most of the articles are anything else but proper journalism, and this is certainly nothing for a contemporary diskmag editor to strive for. this mag is worse than hugi contentwise (although it has supreme music and a very good interface). i can't find ANYTHING good to tell about these contents. and don't tell me i completely miss the point or i am to young to appreciate this or whatever, i was a scener in 1998 and i wouldnt have found all that even slightly interesting back then. a mag focused to 70% on the editors personal flamewars and private life should be called messagebox but not a diskmag.
diskmag editors of present and future, if you look for a rolemodel media concerning scene journalism, don't pick this one!
no thumbdown still since the interface, gfx and music are REALLY good.
well, if writing fillers is the true way of writing diskmags i don't want to have in common anything with diskmags at all. so this is the mag certain people keep idealizing so much while dreaming about "good old diskmag times". bah! seriously, most of the articles are anything else but proper journalism, and this is certainly nothing for a contemporary diskmag editor to strive for. this mag is worse than hugi contentwise (although it has supreme music and a very good interface). i can't find ANYTHING good to tell about these contents. and don't tell me i completely miss the point or i am to young to appreciate this or whatever, i was a scener in 1998 and i wouldnt have found all that even slightly interesting back then. a mag focused to 70% on the editors personal flamewars and private life should be called messagebox but not a diskmag.
diskmag editors of present and future, if you look for a rolemodel media concerning scene journalism, don't pick this one!
no thumbdown still since the interface, gfx and music are REALLY good.
i managed to sneak an article in this one.. and as always.. a cool mang!
Dipswitch: I agree that this is not your "normal" diskmag and that's what I like about O.R. :)
But sure, not everyone likes the O.R. attitude, that's ok for me as well. :) Live and let live I'd say. :)
But sure, not everyone likes the O.R. attitude, that's ok for me as well. :) Live and let live I'd say. :)
Dipswitch:
"a mag focused to 70% on the editors personal flamewars and private life should be called messagebox but not a diskmag"
True! but take a look at old scrolltexts. ;)
"a mag focused to 70% on the editors personal flamewars and private life should be called messagebox but not a diskmag"
True! but take a look at old scrolltexts. ;)
OR was different and yes, that's why I liked it! It was far away from the mainstream. Which was really attractive, at least for me.
this was probably the most entertaining diskmag series ever.
Just nice, average issue of OR with plenty of swedish articles.
Best diskmag ever produced on Amiga. If not the best diskmag ever.
It really does come off as stupendously obnoxious and pretentious (then again, so was I in 1998). The Swedish articles consists mostly of what seems to be high school homework (short essays copied from encyclopedias).
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !