pouët.net

the so complete pouët.net oneliner

• 2019-03-24
• 22:08 send your Amiga disks to me, so i can image them for generations to come!
• 22:19 (or maybe now they're adults).
• 22:20 Where the heck can I fidn 5 themes and no master plan?
• 22:26 JAC!: https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=54433 / https://demozoo.org/music/1123/
• 22:55 I also have the feeling that pouet hayday are gone & that the site is dying slowly but surely.
• 23:01 go make a demo about it (c)(tm)
• 23:01 I will.
• 23:06 Since "the scene is dying" and "Pouet is the scene", it just makes sense!
• 23:24 I think Pouet has never had a "heyday".
• 23:29 More often Pouet has "maydays".
• 23:35 bad science cannot even be called alchemy
• 2019-03-25
• 00:14 @porocyon Thanks!
• 07:08 eAT PANT
• 09:09 at least alchemy gave experience and basic information of chemistry for scientists
• 09:23 Yep. Alchemy is referred to as a protoscience instead of a pseudoscience for good reason. Let's not forget that Newton was an alchemist.
• 09:41 Maybe the so-called "social sciences" are the protosciences of the future. You know what the alternative would be. :D
• 09:55 Social sciences like history, economics and psychology, eh? If we go that route, everything is just a non-precise application of mathematics (which itself is an application of philosophy).
• 10:53 Mathematics is an application of philosophy?
• 11:00 "2b || !2b"
• 11:04 Nice!
• 11:07 In the sense that all sciences are applications of logic.
• 11:09 In that sense, any kind of thought (logical or otherwise) is an application of logic.
• 11:24 True, but modern science applies a particular system with roots in epistemology. Of course, different sciences apply that method with varying purity. I'm rambling here, but I just think that dismissing soft sciences as non-sciences is kind of arbitrary, because that line can be drawn anywhere.
• 11:30 quantity != quality
• 12:53 "The social sciences are largely hokum" - Sheldon Cooper