pouët.net

Go to bottom

### NextEmpire Awards 08, scene celebrating ###

category: general [glöplog]
What Rob and Blala said.
added on the 2008-12-17 16:29:28 by okkie okkie
damn, is my little personality still the mother center of all your problems ? o_O

this time i don't even know which horrible crime i committed, i can't even defend myself! and you know how much i like it :(

if my resume is still the problem, who is pouet human resource manager so that i can send it to him/her ?

...

seriously, as much as i appreciate the great work you (Gargaj & Gloom) do for the demoscene community, you really should get that it is still a wild multikernel aggregate of different people from different backgrounds and nations (even Turkey and Japan :p), and the LegendgrafiX mofo is part of it, my stupid cracktros and latest wild too!

you don't like them, just ignore them.

anyway you should consider me as an Anonymous guy, i'm part of the anonymous intarweb, and so is this awards show parody, it belongs to pouet and scene fun.
added on the 2008-12-17 16:30:44 by Zest Zest
rainmaker: ahah you were crazy, i'm not that brave and masochist :D

i hope the global memory of pouet can dig out the forgotten gems of 2008 :)
added on the 2008-12-17 16:40:07 by Zest Zest
gargaj: maybe a workable compromise could be to sign zest up for "pr0nstahr" or "fakeuser" status? a little bit like maali, back when his testosterone was still going through the roof every other hour... the inmediate advantage of such a decision is that users can decide for themselves if they want to be exposed to zest's mumblings any longer, and the hope is ofcourse that because of the decrease in response he will experience due to his newfound status, zest may actually attempt to find a job or make his life worthwhile in some other manner. that may sound hopeless at first, but it apparently worked wonders for maali, so i'd say it's at least worth a shot. :-)
added on the 2008-12-17 16:49:09 by havoc havoc
Quote:

since when we have a required minimum production/loudmouth ratio on the pouet bbs?


hey, exactly why would that be a bad thing again? ok, bad for the loudmouths who dont make anything, but i know my own personal pouet experience wouldnt suffer from jetisoning a few of them.
added on the 2008-12-17 16:49:26 by smash smash
Perhaps because pouet would've gone from anarchy to oligarchy in one step? There are enough places on the intarweb already where you ability to behave like a total dick is determined by the level of friendship to the moderators only. We don't need another one, kthx.
added on the 2008-12-17 16:55:14 by kb_ kb_
It's not like you are forced to read zest his topics. There are only 74 topics started by him BTW, not THAT much.

Go join the fucking taliban elitist creeps.
if only behaving like a total dick wasnt such a major feature of the internet :(
added on the 2008-12-17 16:57:48 by smash smash
Well, the problem could be solved by leaving the oldschool bbs as it is, and having a moderated invite-only very-elite newschool bbs for all the 15 super-productive elite people who wants to have elite discussions on elite subjects? On the supah-elite pouet v2.0!
added on the 2008-12-17 17:00:12 by blala blala
well i'd probably still be reading zest's shit no matter what his userlevel is, just like i kept reading maali's crap back in the day... call me a dumb timewaster if you like, but elitist?! hmm nah... not really... i think.
added on the 2008-12-17 17:00:51 by havoc havoc
havok: sorry for you, i haven't been jobless for years :p


Xmas time! let's play timewasting games! let's face reality and let figures talk : i demand an official hall of fame(shame) 2008 of pouet bbs talkers, ordered by the number of posts or even the number of words if you prefer!
added on the 2008-12-17 17:01:07 by Zest Zest
Quote:
and having a moderated invite-only very-elite newschool bbs for all the 15 super-productive elite people

We already have that, it's called bitfellas :)
added on the 2008-12-17 17:01:27 by zoom zoom
Quote:
Go join the fucking taliban elitist creeps.


i wish i didnt think pouet would be better if it were more moderated, but im afraid i do.
and its great to see that a wish for some noise reduction is somehow equated to a totalitarian regime, with no middle ground possible whatsoever. i believe thats another feature of internet "discussion".
added on the 2008-12-17 17:01:28 by smash smash
zoom: no, that's a moderated invite-only very elite oldschool bbs for the 100 super-old elite people. :)
added on the 2008-12-17 17:03:35 by smash smash
i vote for a moderated technical forum on pouet!
added on the 2008-12-17 17:05:05 by Zest Zest
Bitfellas is a perfect platform as the more 'serious' version of pouet. Pouet has always been /p/ and always will be.

And for the reason why people turn into assholes on the internet, I have no idea, really. I think it's a combination of communication through written text and anonymity.

I think harshly moderating the pouet bbs will only make things more boring but not more efficient or informative.
added on the 2008-12-17 17:05:12 by okkie okkie
kb_ : we don't need Pouet to turn into 4chan either though, I totally understand Gargaj's and Smash's point.

Gargaj unfortunately reacted on the wrong BSS topic but I'm sure he had in mind the previous hundreds of random pics posted by Zest in the middle of interesting discussions.

And yeah, call Smash the names you want and bring forth all the sarcasm you want with that elite talk but he's still one of the guys who bring us the most interesting prods every single year, unlike idiots posting random crap on the BBS on a regular basis.
added on the 2008-12-17 17:05:16 by keops keops
smash: hmm yeah, you have a point there :)
added on the 2008-12-17 17:06:49 by zoom zoom
Okkie : a slight moderation of the BBS would not hurt though (to prevent the really offensive pictures for example), something less rude than the Bitfellas moderation where you get a serious ban threat mail after writing "open a blog" to a guy on the oneliner :)
added on the 2008-12-17 17:08:21 by keops keops
hey, its not like i want this place to be serious.
bring back shane!
added on the 2008-12-17 17:09:28 by smash smash
guys guys guys, i think someone above was right, you are getting old :(

always going on about the same worn-out reproaches (usually at me, i don't know why, i'm not that lucky in real life), castrating any fun or any interesting wild debate.

this is getting tiring, and hopeless.
added on the 2008-12-17 17:12:49 by Zest Zest
Quote:
We already have that, it's called bitfellas :)

Ah, I didn't know about that, maybe I'm not elite enough :))

Quote:
And yeah, call Smash the names you want and bring forth all the sarcasm you want with that elite talk [...]

Nah, Keops, I was actually thinking of you, not Smash :)
(though I have to admit that I in fact like some of your prods, too. but pssst, don't tell anybody! :)
added on the 2008-12-17 17:46:55 by blala blala
Quote:
i wish i didnt think pouet would be better if it were more moderated, but im afraid i do.

Quote:
Okkie : a slight moderation of the BBS would not hurt though


I talked about it with Garg, he's all but okay about that point. Nice to see that I'm not the only one thinking that a status or something like this should be given to some persons.
added on the 2008-12-17 17:48:21 by iks iks
I'll say it again (for the Nth time): new threads should not end up on the frontpage until some criteria have been met. Like: X amount of replies (by someone else than the thread author). That will take away the attentionwhores.
added on the 2008-12-17 17:57:49 by gloom gloom
The fact that the BBS doesn't have any categories is also something that contributes to the high amount of attentionwhore-noise.
added on the 2008-12-17 18:05:34 by gloom gloom

login

Go to top