Go to bottom

the most annoying bug in pouet

category: general [glöplog]
oh ok, really mysql
added on the 2003-05-02 12:14:27 by faor faor
added on the 2003-05-02 13:10:43 by NoahR NoahR
Oh come ON goddamit, there is no WAY analogue didn't find 20 seconds of time to fix this so far, you can see it above that it's like +1 line of code!
added on the 2003-05-03 21:09:20 by Gargaj Gargaj
added on the 2003-05-05 21:02:19 by diver diver
A good idea to lock down pouet for a while: Paste a userlist URL into some IRC channel, or have it linked. Since the generation time takes around 2 minutes, i guess the CPU will be quite busy with it...
Cache it up dammit.
added on the 2003-05-06 02:34:21 by Gargaj Gargaj
Same goes for the party-index.
added on the 2003-05-06 02:42:29 by Gargaj Gargaj
added on the 2003-05-07 21:46:46 by diver diver
btw, is there something particularly difficult in allowing people to submit only the release year for a prod, without the release month?
added on the 2003-05-08 15:32:01 by reed reed
added on the 2003-05-09 19:54:36 by diver diver
Yes! This one too..
There are productions, where I don't fuckin know the month, but only the year. And even the year alone is an important info itself, for people to know how old a demo they might download is..
added on the 2003-05-09 21:34:50 by Optimus Optimus
Well, talking about special features of pööö.net, let us not forget about the search function. When I search for "the s", the top hit is >>"magnify" - the perfect posion<<(??) by index(??), and the demo "the s" by suspend is just not even on the results' list.
I certainly see a possiblity of improvement of the search engine ;)
added on the 2003-05-09 23:14:14 by Ger Ger
then again you could just use the 'site:' feature of google.com

(site:pouet.net the-s will give you the proper page)
added on the 2003-05-10 13:29:06 by _-_-__ _-_-__
added on the 2003-05-11 21:13:06 by Gargaj Gargaj
added on the 2003-05-12 19:17:02 by diver diver
Whata facka mistaka
added on the 2003-05-13 09:21:02 by Optimus Optimus
added on the 2003-05-13 20:34:01 by Gargaj Gargaj
added on the 2003-05-15 13:14:43 by Gargaj Gargaj
\o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/
added on the 2003-05-15 14:36:49 by Gargaj Gargaj
added on the 2003-05-15 14:52:20 by dalezr dalezr
yes! good job! :-)
added on the 2003-05-15 14:56:56 by moT moT
hä, ähm. test
________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________
added on the 2003-05-24 01:03:56 by diver diver
cool. it works :)

good job!
added on the 2003-05-24 01:05:00 by diver diver
But unfortunately it doesn't work with gfx.
added on the 2003-05-24 11:38:02 by tomaes tomaes
yes. limiting image sizes would be great. and also an easy fix, or? just to allowed to add image size that not bigger than 400 pixels, or something like that. to add pictures as comment sucks anyway.
added on the 2003-05-24 12:03:56 by diver diver
It's not only the size. The main problem is that there is not auto-<br> after each pic, so you can easily make an infinite pic row. However, simply disabling that crap (at least for prod comments) would be the better solution anyway.
added on the 2003-05-24 12:14:04 by tomaes tomaes


Go to top