pouët.net

Go to bottom

Freax vol. 1. - Feedback

category: residue [glöplog]
ham: You're asking me to redefine a fake term that I never used, and give it a new meaning.
added on the 2013-05-29 18:49:58 by tomcat tomcat
Quote:

your countries are down into the drain anyway, turning into Eurabia in a few decades


no need to "libel" anyone, the protagonist shows his true colors all by himself.
added on the 2013-05-29 18:53:50 by dipswitch dipswitch
"oh you are being so rude to me.... YOU STUPID RETARD IDIOTS!"
"sure, women can be independent... AS LONG AS THEY STAY AT HOME AND RAISE THE KIDS"
"why can't you just respect my opinions.... BUT YOUR OPINIONS ARE LIBERAL-COMMUNIST CRAP"

...that's basically what I'm taking away from your posts.
added on the 2013-05-29 18:53:54 by ted ted
dipswitch: Nonsense. "My" video is invincible. It always triumphs.
<3
added on the 2013-05-29 18:55:41 by dipswitch dipswitch
dipswitch, is this a libel? Look at London, Paris, Stockholm. I am just imagining things, right?

ted: Yes, after the tenth occasion of someone calling me names, I dare to drop the ball back. Yes, women are supposed to raise kids, what's wrong with that, hasn't your mother done that? And just as I said, I don't ask you to respect my views, I ask you to respect me. Read back.
added on the 2013-05-29 18:55:51 by tomcat tomcat
I just wanna know your definition of independence and why women, according to you, should not be allowed to be independent.

Also, you said (page 10 of this thread)

Quote:

This entire "be independent, be yourself" crap is advocated by dumb bitches who aren't good for anything, and are not willing to be useful. They sit in a café, munch on cakes bought on their current guy's money and whine about being so suppressed. Thanks, I don't want to see such women around me. To be a strong woman does not mean you have to be an ignorant bitch. We have a lot of strong women in our country's history who never had a problem with being a woman.


I ask you now what is (or whould be) "being a woman" according to you.
added on the 2013-05-29 18:57:41 by ham ham
ham, I don't have a definition of "independence for women", as it has never occurred me to change their social status in any way. Certainly locking them up in the basement is wrong, so we can say independence includes not to be locked up in a basement. I also despise guys who beat their women to force them to stay with them or do things (also rape them), so we can add that to women's independence, not to be forced to do anything. And before you accuse me of doing that, I am not forcing them not to be "independent" in the way you think they should be. I simply say that being like that is wrong. It is actually you (and people like you) who force women to become arrogant cunts, because you push them to behave like this, to be "independent".
added on the 2013-05-29 19:02:05 by tomcat tomcat
HAH!

I'm sorry, in what way is some disfranchised cunts burning some cars every third or fourth year the encroachment and control of Europe by the Muslim horde?

I mean...as world domination plans goes this Eurabian concept seems really shitty.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:03:16 by Deus Deus
trollcat: So... a women that cannot have kids is not really a woman?

By the way, you want people respect you but you are willing to spit insults to every one that points the lack of value in your funny opinions and your feeble arguments. Great.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:03:48 by ham ham
We'll see in 30 years. Have you recently been to Marseille? Do you disagree with that there are certain areas in Paris, but now also in Berlin or London where even the police doesn't dare to go?
added on the 2013-05-29 19:04:52 by tomcat tomcat
Quote:
It is actually you (and people like you) who force women to become arrogant cunts, because you push them to behave like this, to be "independent".

Funny...No one forced you to be a cunt.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:05:00 by Deus Deus
So, I'm forcing women to be arrogant cunts? How?
added on the 2013-05-29 19:05:15 by ham ham
Deus: we can call each others names, but that's not really civilized or mature.

ham: People like you. Saying that "you" did it is actually an exaggeration, it's like pointing at a single ant and saying that this particular one has caused the house to collapse. People you like, who support the idea of "modern, independent woman" cause women to cry alone in empty apartments, taking drugs and alcohol to make up for their lost youth and opportunities, and finally killing themselves. Women who don't accept your bullshit, but find their spouse and build a family together are not ending up like this. There are exceptions on both sides of course, but I am talking about the majority. "Independent" women are chasing a promise, while others are more likely to find happiness.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:09:12 by tomcat tomcat
After reading this thread, all I can say is: I'm happy that tomcat is under house arrest, and pretty much convinced that there's a perfectly valid, non-conspiracy-theory-bullshit reason for it.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:10:51 by psonice psonice
Quote:
We'll see in 30 years. Have you recently been to Marseille? Do you disagree with that there are certain areas in Paris, but now also in Berlin or London where even the police doesn't dare to go?

i dare to disagree. i never felt unsafe yet in berlin, no matter where i go.. maybe you only have to fear the united gay leftist muslim hordes(tm) when you're a fascist?
added on the 2013-05-29 19:13:47 by v3nom v3nom
psionice: So you think that certain opinions should result in detention. Congratulations, you're a good pupil of Stalin or Hitler.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:14:14 by tomcat tomcat
v3nom: I am not a fascist, and actually I'd be happier with those muslims than all the liberalism that's going on.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:14:50 by tomcat tomcat
tomcat: your pathetic attempt to define "independence for women" is disgusting.

What you're doing is taking "women as property of men" and then "generously" granting a few things. You're not even doing so because women deserve it, but because locking them up, beating and raping them is "wrong".

WHAT THE FUCK?!

I'll give you an easy starting point for a definition:
Women are independent when they are free to do whatever the fuck they want, without any man, laws or social conventions restricting them because of their sex.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:22:33 by ted ted
Tomcat, just wondering, you're open about your views on society and politics and they're probably quite extreme to a lot of people's minds. That is a fairly logical approach towards the assumption that you would also propose drastic measures to achieve your stated goals. Does that assumption have any base in reality or would you prefer another way of achieving said goals, for example by means of traditional democratic processes and lawmaking?
added on the 2013-05-29 19:24:10 by havoc havoc
Tomcat, just wondering, you're open about your views on society and politics and they're probably quite extreme to a lot of people's minds. That is a fairly logical approach towards the assumption that you would also propose drastic measures to achieve your stated goals. Does that assumption have any base in reality or would you prefer another way of achieving said goals, for example by means of traditional democratic processes and lawmaking?
added on the 2013-05-29 19:24:10 by havoc havoc
I think you're an idiot too. I specifically said:

Quote:
I also despise guys who beat their women to force them to stay with them or do things (also rape them), so we can add that to women's independence, not to be forced to do anything.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:24:23 by tomcat tomcat
@tomcat: you are deluded if you think there are places in London the police don't dare to go to.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:24:36 by visy visy
trollcat: You seems very concerned by the idea of happiness.

However, when I asked (page 12) to you "What would you do in the hypothetical case that you had an homosexual son or daugther?" your answers was...

[quoute]
if I had a homosexual son or daughter, I'd accept that, however I'd be just as sad for him/her as if he/she was crippled.
[/quote]

Perhaps you will prefer to give your hypothetical homosexual progeny in adoption to a gay couple or some single mother. As they would be happier with parents that will not despise them for being that way.
added on the 2013-05-29 19:25:51 by ham ham
visy: I might be, but I am certain about Paris, and especially Marseille. And as I heard, your super-tolerant countries are rounding up Gypsies in concentration camps. It was on the news. Heard of that?
added on the 2013-05-29 19:26:00 by tomcat tomcat

login

Go to top