pouët.net

button information 599 glöps

• general:
• level: user
• personal:
• first name: fallen
• last name: down
• cdcs:
• cdc #1: Desert Dream by Kefrens
• cdc #2: The Ballet Dancer by mfx [web]
• cdc #3: Agenda Circling Forth by Fairlight [web] & Carillon & Cyberiad [web]
• cdc #4: Human Resistance by Pers' Wastaiset Produktiot [web]

• 4k procedural graphics Windows Smoking Kills by Loonies [web]
• yeah, that was a rant and i don't care.
• isokadded on the 2009-07-30 05:42:43
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Smoking Kills by Loonies [web]
• "I hate smokers and smoke and believe it can kill me but I'll still follow my smoker 'friends' into smoke filled rooms"
  
  = a human lemming
  
  "I follow them because I need to be around them no matter what"
  
  = a person with childish emotional dependancy and a need to "belong" to a group at all costs. Basic herd mentality.
  
  "I lack the social skills/confidence to simply let smokers know that I would prefer them not to smoke around me. So, like a child who wants to please everyone, I pretend I do not mind when asked that common question: "is it ok if I smoke?" I need laws to be enforced so I dont have to speak for myself and say that unfriendly word: NO!"
  
  = an immature person with little social skills nor the ability to handle and manage minor/avoidable irritants in his OWN life.
  
  "I listen to mainstream misleading propaganda about 'passive smoke' and bogus claims about the health issues it causes, when there is a mountain of evidance and research to the contrary"
  
  = a media spoon-feed, fully passive consumer of BS....without a mind of his own.
  
  Pro-ban types really are the weakest minded nitwits I've ever com across. Sorry, but you really are!
  
  How on earth can you agree with government authority banning ANY activity between and among CONCENTING ADULTS, in their OWN premises? Do you people have no spines or sense of autonomy? ffs. uuuurgh.
  
  AS Doom has already said, if you don't like smoke - FUCK OFF!! All you had to do was quite following us around like fking leeches. It's not difficult.
  
  There is no outdoor smoking ban, so in theory I can still walk up to IQ, sit beside him and begin smoking. So, really, what good has this ban done apart from you having "power" to dictate to people what they can't and can't do in private buildings which they own?
  
  anyways, you will pay for your feebleminds, because I'm pretty certain I can see a hightech technocratic dictatorship springing up all around us right now. it may be early days, but with compliant lemmings like the "proban" masochists just BEGGING for their liberties to be taken away, it wont take long to be implimented. And it's not going to be nice when we all finally reach the stage where we can't walk down the street withoput a permit. not even for you blinkered nitwits.
  
  unfortunately I;m also going to have to suffer the consequences of your weak compliance to nanny-state authority and that's what pisses me off the most. MUCH more than the isolated issue of me and my friends and the rest of a bar not being "allowed" to smoke.
  
  go live on an isolated isaland somwhere, ffs!
• isokadded on the 2009-07-30 05:40:22
• demo Amiga AGA Experiment 2007 by Rave Network Overscan [web]
• not bad, worth a watch
• rulezadded on the 2009-07-27 19:33:35
• demo Amiga OCS/ECS Das Grönland by MuMu21 [web]
• puke
• sucksadded on the 2009-07-27 19:28:15
• 4k Windows Lesser by Youth Uprising
• video pls, for us poor ppl without the snazy gfx cards :)
• isokadded on the 2009-07-25 04:50:50
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Smoking Kills by Loonies [web]
• riiiight, so the real reason for the ban was because you and the government and these ant-smoking NGOs find smokers "annoying"? funny, that was never mentioned in the media propaganda buildup to the bans. it was all about how dangerous "passive smoke" is.
  
  but anyway, the real problem for us (and all the other selfish non-smokers who agree with these draconian bans) is that these nanny-state anti-smoking legislations - like so many other similar situations with authority - will set a precedent. think of it as an acid-test to demonstrate our willingness to be dictated to. other bans will follow in the years to come and no doubt your precious alcohol will be another item on the ban-hammer hitlist. after all, "passive smoke" kills faaaar less people than violence and accidents caused by drunken drinkers and many would even say that smoke is less annoying than those loud-mouthed drunkards you often see wanting to start a fight with everyone in the bar.
  
  In fact, I have already noticed the "anti-drink brigade" (they look strangely similar to the "anti- smoke brigade", for some reason!) winding up their propaganda through the general media. demonizing drinkers, just as they have done with smokers. let's see how you like the drink ban when it comes...
  
  hmmmmm, let's see...what next? banning and restricting the internet because government finds its freedom and flow of information "annoying"? oh, wait a minute, they're already in the process of doing that! but then, it's no wonder they are shamelessly doing this - since they have already told people that they cannot allow smoking in their OWN business premiss. it's not such a big step from that to dictating to people what they can and can't read on the internet in their own homes....i guess..
  
  you see, all these little infringments on our right to "choose" and make decisions lead to a wider road. you let them start with the small things through utter selfish reasons (ie: because YOU personally do not smoke and find it "annoying") and it becomes a trend. and one day - it wont be "eating shit" which gets banned - it will be something YOU enjoy.
  
  but, yeh...hooooray for the smoking ban!! \o/
• isokadded on the 2009-07-24 04:17:30
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Smoking Kills by Loonies [web]
• see how easy it is to be brainwashed. and i bet you're not even a religious person. good propaganda becomes reflex reaction for the masses...and they don't even stop to analyse what they're doing or saying :D
  
  meh, i'll stfu now
• isokadded on the 2009-07-23 21:17:21
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Smoking Kills by Loonies [web]
• Quote:

  you should probably move this discussion elsewhere...

  
  
  why? the producers of this demo have made a conscious effort to mix demo with political propaganda. and as such this is an ideal place to discuss the demo's content.
  
  + what Doom said.
• isokadded on the 2009-07-23 20:31:17
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Smoking Kills by Loonies [web]
• but having said that, if you are in public and a non-smoker objects to inhaling your fumes...any smoker with a sense of decency should put his fag out _immediately_. i have actually never met a smoker who wouldn't do this.
  
  so, really, i'm not sure what all this legal legislation and media demonization of smoking is about. it's ridiculous and just diverts the attention away from the REAL health issues in society.
• isokadded on the 2009-07-22 20:10:58
• 4k procedural graphics Windows Smoking Kills by Loonies [web]
• psionic: people who choose to smoke are the least factor causing the massive increases in cancer amoung non-smokers in recent years - I can assure you. You'd be better off moaning to your national Food Association/Authority who give licence to food manufatures who use chemicals, presservatives and processes known and proven to cause cancer.
  
  strange that you've been told to be aware of "passive smoke" (which is proven to cause insignificant risk), yet noone tells you about the dangers of the food your're stuffing your face with every day.
  
  smokers are the least of your worries as far as getting cancere is concerned
• isokadded on the 2009-07-22 20:00:50