AI crap in compo entries?
category: general [glöplog]
Everybody cool down and re-read "Gödel Escher Bach", then compare to what we have now. Still scared? :)
Thank you @tomkh for showing us your beautiful mind.
Ok, but how about R2-D2 and C3PO?
Or Roomba.
Quote:
Tempted to feed this thread to gpt and start posting its replies.
So I did (only fairly recent posts).
Here is ChatGPT reply.
Quote:
From the conversation, it seems like the individuals have varying stances on AI:
bitfat: Seems to have a nuanced view, acknowledging AI's technical capabilities while also recognizing its limitations in producing original, artistic content. They also express concerns about the demoscene's future in the face of AI-generated content.
Krill: Appears to be dismissive of conspiracy theories and overly negative views on AI, perhaps leaning towards a more optimistic or neutral stance.
4gentE: Expresses strong skepticism and criticism towards AI, labeling it as "pure crap" and expressing concerns about its impact on creativity, jobs, and society as a whole. They seem to be particularly passionate about this viewpoint.
tomkh: Appears to have a more balanced view, acknowledging both the potential benefits and drawbacks of AI. They also question the fear surrounding AI and express disappointment in current AI products, suggesting that they may not live up to the sci-fi portrayals of powerful AI entities.
As for who is trolling the most, it's subjective and could depend on interpretation. 4gentE seems to engage in some heated exchanges and accuses others of manipulation or misunderstanding, which could be seen as a form of trolling. However, without more context on the dynamics of the conversation and the intentions behind each comment, it's challenging to definitively identify who is trolling the most.
And here would be 4gentE reply in his "own" words (according to ChatPGT of course).
Quote:
Okay, let me clarify my stance on AI once more, because apparently it's not getting through. Yes, I'm skeptical, and damn right I'm critical. We're not talking about some sci-fi fantasy here; we're talking about real-life implications. And forgive me for not jumping on the bandwagon of blind excitement when the so-called advancements are, frankly, underwhelming.
Sure, maybe I come off strong, but that's because I see through the smoke and mirrors. I'm not about to sit back and watch while some tech-bros shove their half-baked AI down our throats. And if that makes me the 'dramatic' one, then so be it.
As for who's trolling the most? Let's just say, when you're dealing with walls that refuse to hear, it's hard to tell who's really trolling.
Quote:
Thank you @tomkh for showing us your beautiful mind.
Human:
Should humans be excited about Skynet?
ChatGPT:
Humans should not be excited about Skynet. In the "Terminator" movies, Skynet is depicted as a threat to humanity, leading to a dystopian future where machines are at war with humans.
Well whaddya know? This artificial intelligence indeed seems to have more intelligence than some protein-based entities.
Admittedly, to some the movie was perhaps hard to comprehend not being in 3D.
Should humans be excited about Skynet?
ChatGPT:
Humans should not be excited about Skynet. In the "Terminator" movies, Skynet is depicted as a threat to humanity, leading to a dystopian future where machines are at war with humans.
Well whaddya know? This artificial intelligence indeed seems to have more intelligence than some protein-based entities.
Admittedly, to some the movie was perhaps hard to comprehend not being in 3D.
I mean...ok, that's objectively funny. I would love to see 3d remake where machines actually win.
Me:
Is an online entity showing enthusiasm about Skynet a human?
ChatGPT:
No, an online entity showing enthusiasm for Skynet is not a human. (…)
@tomkh:
This is a pretty good explainer for what I was telling you earlier: that conversing with you sometimes makes me wonder what kind of entity is on the other side. That I wasn’t aiming to insult you. And, again, I’m not trolling you (now), I just saw this as an oportunity to better explain my feelings. Peace.
Is an online entity showing enthusiasm about Skynet a human?
ChatGPT:
No, an online entity showing enthusiasm for Skynet is not a human. (…)
@tomkh:
This is a pretty good explainer for what I was telling you earlier: that conversing with you sometimes makes me wonder what kind of entity is on the other side. That I wasn’t aiming to insult you. And, again, I’m not trolling you (now), I just saw this as an oportunity to better explain my feelings. Peace.
We need to submit you to Voight-Kampff. ;-)
Yeah I think we're done here.
