pouët.net

There is a problem with this prod: ...Please remove spam link to malicious website from this comment: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=82745#c871010

There is a problem with this prod: set demozoo id to 266523

sq: "malicious" as in "formatted all my storage" or as in "says unfriendly things i don't agree with" ?

poro: done, next time you're welcome use the edit request system to add demozoo links ;)

havoc, none of these, but isn't that a spam? does pouet policy allow to spam random urls with ads in comments?

sq: the url doesn't work from over here. generally speaking, linking to sites with ads on them isn't necessarily a reason for deletion.

There is a problem with this prod: isn't it related with this entry somehow? ;)



Still not fixed.

done (with screenshot swap)

There is a problem with this prod: ...
Could you please remove this production from pouet? I'm the author of this, but this was never a released product, someone seemed to have uploaded some non-working testcode by mistake even though it says do not spread in the text ;)

There is a problem with this prod: ... I sent in three edit requests to change the download link. One is from zxart.ee, one is from zxaaa.untergrund.net, and one is from zxaaa.net. Please use the download link from zxaaa.net instead of the other two.

This prod was released in final version and there is new nfo for this prod.

mborik: done
WareNetwork2000: someone did something. next time please submit only 1 link.

There is a problem with this prod: ...

I accidentally rated my own demo as "is ok". Could you guys change it to thums up, or delete my comment?

That's perfectly normal and is accepted as the "neutral" rating :)

also, can't you turn it into an up/downvote with a 2nd comment?

There is a dublicate of Saturne party: first and second. Well, actually dublicate is only 1994, because 1995 was only in second list (was cancelled btw) and, according on Demozoo info, there was two Saturne parties in 1996: III and IV, so, I think, the second list should be renamed to... like, "Saturne .2" or smth like that.

100bit: "dupe" years are fixed now (i think). having dupe parties in the db because the system can't handle multiple parties in a year under the same name admittedly kinda sucks and this is the party where the end result of that lacking feature is the worst. having said that, just adding a self invented number to the partyname won't make it easier for folks to pick the right one, they'd first have to investigate what edition is meant. like, the roman numerals on demozoo, why is IV the 5th party in the series and not the 4th? etc etc.

i wanted to add more youtube links from my channel:
https://www.pouet.net/topic.php?which=11696

i set "youtube @ retro PC" as the label to indicate why is it special, compared to another youtube link. in the faq i did not find anything, why should it be problematic. they did not allowed it. why?

how can i distinguish it? thx.

arncht: Dunno anything about the specific prod/case but who needs more than a normal capture and maybe a live video of a prod? i mean really.

sensenstahl: sorry, i dont understand you.

i capture popular demos and intros on real retro pcs in 4k60p output, i would like to link that to the related production. i set "youtube @ retro PC" - not allowed, why is it wrong? what could i set? a second "youtube" does not make sense (also, if it is better quality).

arn: the problem is, maybe "@retro PC" makes a lot of sense to you but i have no clue what it means (is it your channel name or smth? ppl will see that when they click the link anyway so i don't see the point). also, as sensenstahl said, two youtube links should be enough in practically all cases, more is unnecessarily confusing- people just want to see the best capture, or maybe the party version (with crowd noises etc), but not 5 different ones.

so if your capture is arguably/objectively better than the one we link to currently you're welcome to suggest replacing the link via the edit request system. some arguments as to why the link should be replaced can help us to make the decision to accept or deny, stuff like better resolution/framerate, capture from real hardware, fixed sync/audio and so on could be arguments to accept the suggestion.

so you basically suggest to overwrite the old links? on the demozoo it is possible to add more youtube links.

will it be fine, if i indicate:"youtube (4k60p real retroPC)"? and you can keep the youtube.

every retro demo: 4k60p captured on real retro hw (gus, etc), pixel perfect output, where it is possible.

prio1: bugfree running, right timing (eg not too fast, find the right balance)
prio2: high fps (i dont want 5 fps, if it was available eg in 1995 - you cannot enjoy)

the point with the (retro) authentic pcs, to show, how they looked in the past. i use basically 5 pcs, and even more variations (replace the video card, if it is not compatible).

but you can check it by yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/user/arncht/videos?view=0&sort=da&flow=grid&view_as=subscriber

here is the topic about it:
https://www.pouet.net/topic.php?which=11696

arn: look man, i'm sympathetic to your capturing efforts. captures from real hardware at high resolution and framerate, that's cool stuff no doubt. but please just stop trying to negotiate a special label for your links because we really don't want that.

ok, no problem.

this prod has a broken link.
it should be replaced by this

tigrou: read the red box...