CR-ASM by The Cronies

screenshot added by orby on 2015-07-06 07:26:39

platform :	MS-Dos MS-Dos MS-Dos/gus MS-Dos/gus
type :	512b 512b
release date :	july 2015

popularity : 54%

54%

0.71

alltime top: #16206

orby [code]

added on the 2015-07-06 07:26:39 by orby

popularity helper

increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

or via: facebook twitter pinterest tumblr bluesky threads

comments

Haha, nice! Now show us that it's really a demotool and code a demo with it! :-D

rulez added on the 2015-07-06 09:03:39 by Kylearan

I love that!

rulez added on the 2015-07-06 11:53:39 by baah

nice asm :)

rulez added on the 2015-07-06 12:12:23 by wbcbz7

It was going to be more elegant, but all I managed was either a COM file with just "Z" in it, a COM file that generated an exception, a COM file that produced nothing, or the ever popular COM file that printed out its own ASM source but bookended by a shitload of gibberish.

Code:

MOV AX, 0200
MOV DX, 0057
INT 21
MOV DX, 0045
INT 21
MOV DX, 0020
INT 21
MOV DX, 004C
INT 21
MOV DX, 004F
INT 21
MOV DX, 0056
INT 21
MOV DX, 0045
INT 21
MOV DX, 0020
INT 21
MOV DX, 0043
INT 21
MOV DX, 0055
INT 21
MOV DX, 0042
INT 21
MOV DX, 0045
INT 21
MOV DX, 0053
INT 21
MOV DX, 000D
INT 21
MOV DX, 000A
INT 21
MOV AX, 4C00
INT 21

I spent several hours just getting to the point where I decided to go back to what you see above. I'm going back to C. :P

added on the 2015-07-06 14:06:26 by Starchaser

In short: ARGH! but also, I suppose, it deserves a thumbs up for at least working, even if I don't understand it. Though I don't know that it necessarily deserves the GUS category tag or demotool, until someone actually creates one with it that does more than print some hard-coded text.

rulez added on the 2015-07-06 14:09:07 by Starchaser

Brilliant

rulez added on the 2015-07-06 14:28:53 by Optimus

Can we please stop calling things demotools just because they require user input?

added on the 2015-07-06 14:53:23 by Gargaj

Please note that stating in .nfo Turing-completeness can be realized since 1962 with as few as 4 mnemonics) in the non-mathematical usage "that any real-world general-purpose computer or computer language can approximately simulate the computational aspects of any other real-world general-purpose computer or computer language".

Curious about DSx mnemonic I looked on the Internet :
"1.12. DSB, DSW etc - Storage Reservation Intel ASM-96 syntax: [label:] DSB|DSW|DSL|DSP|DSR expression" src.

In last resort this cannot even be used as an initiation to language programming for example.

I really wanted to thumb this up, but poor choice of mnemonics (no add mnemonic while 3 mov mnemonics MOVXX,YY STOB STOW), lack or original ASM-96 reference/credits, dubious techno babble about Turing-completeness and lack of greets while obviously riding Girl Basic 2K momentum (same month) make it a thumb down.

please try to credit original author(s).

sucks added on the 2015-07-06 15:35:52 by Baudsurfer

Quote:

Please note that stating in .nfo Turing-completeness can be realized since 1962 with as few as 4 mnemonics)

Actually, you only need one on x86.

Quote:

Curious about DSx mnemonic I looked on the Internet :
"1.12. DSB, DSW etc - Storage Reservation Intel ASM-96 syntax: [label:] DSB|DSW|DSL|DSP|DSR expression" src.

Nice find. I honestly made up the DSW and DSD mnemonics (data string word and data string double-word), though its not surprising that someone else has used the same mnemonics to do the same thing.

Quote:

In last resort this cannot even be used as an initiation to language programming for example.

Obviously not.

added on the 2015-07-06 19:21:16 by orby

unusual thingie thumbs :)

rulez added on the 2015-07-06 19:33:52 by sensenstahl

neat, seems to work

rulez added on the 2015-07-06 22:41:19 by Harekiet

Took me a minute of staring at the screenshot to realize what you were doing. Nice one!
Next step is to recreate Ken Thompson's compiler backdoor in 512b.

rulez added on the 2015-07-07 02:07:06 by jmph