Go to bottom
Copper Tapes by Lord Kelvin
screenshot added by lordKelvin on 2006-12-19 19:45:27
platform :
type :
release date : december 2006
  • 2
  • 11
  • 6
popularity : 49%
  • -0.21
alltime top: #63688
added on the 2006-12-19 19:45:27 by lordKelvin lordKelvin

popularity helper

increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

or via: facebook twitter pinterest tumblr


If they would move it would have been a nice 128byte intro.
added on the 2006-12-19 19:52:44 by StingRay StingRay
ok nice one. however it's time you favor quality over quantity :)
rulez added on the 2006-12-19 20:11:16 by anesthetic anesthetic
should move.
added on the 2006-12-19 20:17:26 by Preacher Preacher
added on the 2006-12-19 20:37:45 by Cj Cj
Exactly what I had in mind too :)
added on the 2006-12-19 21:22:06 by StingRay StingRay
Nice u 3 me.
rulez added on the 2006-12-19 21:23:21 by Pirx Pirx
Quite ok but why is it so slow?
added on the 2006-12-19 21:44:28 by T$ T$
How do you measure the speed here when nothing on screen moves? ;)
added on the 2006-12-19 21:54:43 by StingRay StingRay
The speed of drawing?
added on the 2006-12-19 21:57:29 by masterm masterm
TS: It`s slow because of interrupt-emulation in windows. Try useing DosBox - there it flies.
sucks added on the 2006-12-19 22:08:00 by lordKelvin lordKelvin
i second lord Kelvin's thumb :)
sucks added on the 2006-12-19 23:05:37 by waffle waffle
Lord Kelvin, plz, stop use interrupt for drawing pixels, this evil! ;)
added on the 2006-12-20 07:15:48 by BiTL BiTL
sucks added on the 2006-12-20 08:48:10 by spritus spritus
uhm. colors.perfomance.idea
sucks added on the 2006-12-20 11:30:00 by wie8 wie8
Takes 30 seconds to render a frame on a modern pc, but runs in realtime on a c64?
sucks added on the 2006-12-20 14:05:30 by psonice psonice
Agree, should move. Maybe it's quite possible to do something similar like my old kefrens256 intro, either with hardware trix or in software, in 128b?
added on the 2006-12-20 15:08:30 by Optimonk Optimonk
- no movement
- draw handling
sucks added on the 2006-12-20 15:30:22 by hashdash hashdash
Here is the version, that was updated according to remarks.=)
There was no need to submit a new entry though, you could have just posted a new download link in the "fix me beautilful" thread.
Pouet would be totally bloated and overloaded if people submitted a new entry each time they made a new version of their prod :)
added on the 2006-12-20 19:19:14 by keops keops
you should try more parameters and techniques on polishing one production and try don't add a few new versions. just spend a bit more time on the next prod.
added on the 2006-12-20 19:24:04 by wie8 wie8
wie8: The funny thing is that I thought prod was finished. But a pack of thumbdowns opened my eyes.
keops: It`s not a new version, prod is totally rebuilt. Only image is someway the same.
Try to move it, man!
added on the 2006-12-30 20:22:01 by sim sim
sim: It really moves http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=28336. Thank you for concern.
moving version is better.

submit changes

if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,

do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.

instead, click here !

[previous edits]

add a comment

Go to top