the so complete pouët.net oneliner
- 2012-08-20
-
I'm stuck at OpenGL 2.1 :( -
Poor you. Any chance on projecting the range of your interest to <0, 1> ? -
The last OpenGL 2.1 compatible card was probably built in the 80s. - Surely is possible, but could I lose precision? I am doing a big fat ass blur/diffusion thing for AI path finding, so I want pixel sources to "spread" as much as possible.
-
why 2.1?! - las: Because I'm programming on an IBM t60 with a x1300 Mobility. Anyway, I got floating point textures to work, and it does so flawlessly, so YAY :)
-
2.1<3 -
11.1 <3 - my card only does 11.0 :(
- oh shit so does mine :(
- dang, we should both upgrade!
-
That's why I like Macs, you can buy the most expensive GPU there is out there.. and it will still only support OpenGL 2.1 .. or wait.. that's quite bad actually - but why?!?!
- your argument is invalid, pre-mountain lion macos supported GL core profile. things got way much worse if you tried to turn to compatibility profile - by rights you ended up with something like 2.1 or 2.2 :)
- I have Mountain Lion on a Retina mac and according to OpenGL Extenstions Viewer I have OpenGL 2.1 support.. So that is invalid?
- https://developer.apple.com/graphicsimaging/opengl/capabilities/ says 3.2
- I know.. that what makes it more annoying
- What if you run Windows on the machine?
- you'll get a working OS and better GPU support? :)
-
screw dieting, let's have some DEMOISH CAKE. http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/20/mobius-cake/ -
choose zero polys and carbs -
Inge Koschmidder fickt den Briefträger! Und alle sollen es erfahren! Inge, DU HURE!!! - yeah, that's what terribly sucks about apple's attitude. screw the users, let's put them in th ice age and force to use oldschool GL standards :)
-
Yes! This oneliner was written with self-made SOLAR POWER!! :) -
That love :D