pouët.net

the so complete pouët.net oneliner

• 2009-10-26
• 22:49 thats not so bad i think. they could have included the data inside the filename (in b64) and filename as data. (i should patent this)
• 22:55 wut? extension was just a soundtracker stuff.. amiga didnt care for extensions :P
• 23:07 "how can we render it ?" rotfl, and a good PANTS OFF to y'all! :-)
• 23:08 Abgespritzt und abgewichst
• 23:11 Amiga and extensions? Pfff. Amiga was looking at the file's header. Rename an mp3 file and try to play it under f.e. winamp. It really sucks... How is it possible that Amiga passed away with its modular architecture!!!! Pha Q Billy Gaytz...
• 23:14 http://psubuntu.com/
• 23:24 yay - my stationary is up and running again!
• 23:24 Vollgespritzt und liegen gelassen
• 23:40 word (spasti ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMjLWdIFd0o&fmt=18
• 23:42 Sim: no, the software was. it has nothing to do with the extension - irfanview, for example opens any picture file correctly regardless of extension.
• 2009-10-27
• 00:02 Good software does not confide in extensions! :)
• 00:20 mpt never trusts extensions, it just tries to apply all loaders until one can load the module :D
• 00:23 Gargaj: yep, I've noticed that too (even it proposes rename the ext. for a proper one). It is rather obvious that it is easier to check the ext. rather than sniff into the program.
• 00:25 Extension were invented by lazy programmers. ;)
• 00:26 ASD - Antidote For The Masses: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fjyp_Ibawfw&feature=PlayList&p=361D5CEA2B 7D567D
• 00:29 Random Demogroupname - Random Demo: http://www.youtube.com/
• 01:34 PANTS OFF!
• 04:36 sick of pants off
• 06:41 yeah keep your pants on when you're in public plz
• 07:22 PANTS OFF!
• 07:38 PANTS OFF!
• 07:40 PANTS OFF!
• 08:26 PANTS OFF!
• 08:27 PANTS OFF!
• 08:37 PANTS OFF!