pouët.net

manually controlled makefiles that get automated with configure scripts in the end anyway vs. automated makefiles wrapped with software project settings.... hmm, though choice :`(

dila, gcc once gave me this:

Keeps the rust from ecx

It's some cache-optimizing trick, I reckon.

I recently had an argument with someone, who wanted, like me, to use Linux for software development... me: "PLEASE DON'T. YOUR VS EXPRESS WORKS! DOCUMENTED WELL. WHY BREAK STUFF? DON'T DO THIS WITHOUT A GOOD REASON!!!". Uh, he doesn't listen... now i shall probably have even more stuff to fix for him.

Rubicante: crude file contents search (aka grep) is the best help for compile and link problems... really, on whatever system you are. It gets you fixed within minutes.

When you're just experimenting you can use processing to keep compiler hell at a safe distance. Installing a library is as simple as extracting it to the 'libraries' folder.

wrong link of course! http://processing.org/

kb, as sad as it is, there are people that hump stuffed penguins for living and need to use GCC to compile stuff... :)

and fuckings to the guy reviving this thread...