pouët.net

Go to bottom
wave_lines by Gluk
screenshot added by Pirx on 2007-12-09 22:24:25
platform :
type :
release date : december 2007
  • 1
  • 5
  • 23
popularity : 55%
 55%
  • -0.76
alltime top: #57804
added on the 2007-12-09 22:20:49 by Gluk Gluk

popularity helper

increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

or via: facebook twitter pinterest tumblr

comments

Enough already. Will you make all possible ugly combinations of asm opcodes in 32b or what ?
sucks added on the 2007-12-09 22:32:57 by keops keops
Everything has already been said ...
sucks added on the 2007-12-09 22:36:31 by BiTbUsTeR BiTbUsTeR
Nigga please!
sucks added on the 2007-12-09 22:38:07 by masterm masterm
Gluk, if making (it's not even coding, it's making) such things is fun for you, do it even every day, but don't release them as demoscene productions. Because of that "prods" people associate 32B category with spam, do you think it's ok? Try to realize some 128B or 256B reasonable project.
added on the 2007-12-09 22:44:58 by Pirx Pirx
If you like asm hacks, I recommend releasing them all at once as an intropack ;-). But seriously, a stray interrupt will overwrite your code when messing up SP like this -- even under pure DOS. ESCable versions, please?
sucks added on the 2007-12-09 22:48:12 by rrrola rrrola
sucks added on the 2007-12-09 22:48:50 by shock__ shock__
Ok, I did that a few times, but it's not like anyone will keep looking at my 32Bs for 32000 frames ;-)
added on the 2007-12-09 22:49:49 by rrrola rrrola
The lines are diagonal but my thumb goes straight down. Cut it out already and code something with a point :)
sucks added on the 2007-12-09 22:51:55 by Preacher Preacher
i once wrote a program which would take a 256b intro, modify a few bits and test the result in dosbox, by analyzing it's screenshot. using 10 different versions, the two best ones would be merged, by randomly taking parts of both, making new children. (you probably remember this from some website, just using fpga chips? :D)
to get to the point: since my screenshot-analyzer-code was lousy and lame, after some iterations the result was exactly like your last three 32b submissions here. please stop adding such random crap, or i'll add a "auto-submit prod to pouet"-feature.

(actually i won't since all bit-modifications were completly random and the results run only on dosbox, not on real thing)

there's still science to do \o/
sucks added on the 2007-12-09 23:42:27 by red red
UTTER UTTER UTTER CRAP!

sucks added on the 2007-12-09 23:50:44 by scoutski scoutski
The day when the crap learned to reproduce itself :(
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 00:09:51 by src src
oh snap
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 00:22:58 by p01 p01
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 06:29:38 by zeebr zeebr
I haven't rated this yet?!
If you're going to make shitloads of minimalistic(size-wise) intros, then consider yourself to release them in an intropack or something so that you don't release them every time you change place of a XOR operand.
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 07:16:44 by waffle waffle
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 10:42:43 by wie8 wie8
GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK ! GLUK !
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 10:53:04 by Tigrou Tigrou
what everyone else said
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 12:10:28 by toxie toxie
well, i think its crap :D

but don't stop doing those,and don't stop releasing them. we all release shit here in some way or another.
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 13:07:57 by quisten quisten
waffle, xor is not an operand.
added on the 2007-12-10 18:47:20 by Pirx Pirx
sucks added on the 2007-12-10 18:59:55 by v3nom v3nom
For the benefit of Waffle;

http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/dictionary/detail.asp?guid=&searchtype=&DicID=18416&RefType=Encyclopedia
added on the 2007-12-10 21:00:08 by Shockwave Shockwave
eehrm...
4 postZ by me in the last one...and still i just wasted my Time,i guess...
...c´mon,Gluk...do a search for "32b" on Pouet,watch em ALL and come back(release) sth again,when you are SURE no1 (or in these cases many other ppl) achieved exactly the same thing already "once upon a Time".!
sry,i had a bad day.! ;)

still.: what Quisten said.!! ;)

sucks added on the 2007-12-10 21:31:48 by ɧ4ɾɗվ. ɧ4ɾɗվ.
XOR is not an operand, but "XOR operand" is a perfectly good term for "the operand associated with an XOR instruction" - just like "steak knife" is a perfectly good name for the knife associated with steak, even though steak is not a knife. As such, waffle's comment makes complete sense.

Pirx, Shockwave - you fail at grammar nazism :-P
added on the 2007-12-12 12:53:04 by gasman gasman
Gluk can release what he has pleasure for.
sucks added on the 2007-12-12 13:18:24 by Optimus Optimus
@gasman
do you mean "XOR opcode"?
added on the 2007-12-12 13:21:48 by xeron xeron
gasman, English is primitive language and I'm not sure what waffle had exactly on mind, but tone of his comment suggests he can be wrong. I didn't write he's wrong, take my comment as "just so you know" tip, not as a biting remark.
added on the 2007-12-12 22:50:08 by Pirx Pirx
Bash me if you will, but I actually fell for this one. (The only thumb up this prod is going to get, I reckon)
rulez added on the 2007-12-14 05:09:10 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
xor operandcodes (hah!) rule the world. just like thumb downs \o/
sucks added on the 2007-12-18 14:15:24 by StingRay StingRay
okish
added on the 2008-12-25 01:21:24 by T$ T$
fuck no
sucks added on the 2010-06-06 00:53:53 by relias abardon relias abardon
holy shiiite.
sucks added on the 2014-12-14 12:19:00 by sensenstahl sensenstahl

submit changes

if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,

do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.

instead, click here !

[previous edits]

add a comment

Go to top